Evaluation of left visuospatial neglect: Norms and discrimination power of two tests.

Vanier, Marie T.; Gauthier, Louise; Lambert, Jacques; Pepin, E. P.; Robillard, Alain; Dubouloz, Claire-Jehanne; Gagnon, Ryan J.; Joannette, Yves

doi:10.1037/0894-4105.4.2.87

Cited by 121 publications

(57 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus a total of 13 participants with HH (6 with right HH) were included in analyses. None had visual neglect (Bells test 20 and Schenkenberg Line Bisection tests 21 ) or significant cognitive decline ( ‡24 on Mini Mental State Examination 22 ). All had HH of at least 4 months duration and visual acuity of 20/30 or better in each eye.…”

Section: Methods Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Driving With Hemianopia: IV. Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections in a Simulator

Bowers¹,

Ananyev²,

Mandel³

et al. 2014

Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methods Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Driving With Hemianopia: IV. Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections in a Simulator

Bowers¹,

Ananyev²,

Mandel³

et al. 2014

Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Four cancellation tests were included, namely Albert's Line Cancellation test with a cut-off of two omissions (Halligan & Marshall, 1989;Vanier et al, 1990) (Weintraub & Mesulam, 1988) with a cut-off of three omissions, the Search for Os, which is not publicly available but clinically widely used in The Netherlands (cut-off of three omissions) and the Bells test with a cut-off of four omissions (Gauthier, Dehaut, & Joanette, 1989;Vanier et al, 1990). The other two tasks in the neglect battery were the Line Bisection test, which was scored as a function of omitted lines (cut-off = 2) (Schenkenberg, Bradford, & Ajax, 1980;Soukup, Harrell, & Clark, 1994;Van Deusen, 1984) and the Representational Drawing test (cut-off = 2) (Wilson, Cockburn, & Halligan, 1987).…”

Section: Methods Patientsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Driving and visuospatial performance in people with hemianopia

Tant¹,

Brouwer²,

Cornelissen³

et al. 2002

Neuropsychological Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Practical fitness to drive was studied in 28 patients with homonymous hemianopia (HH). More specifically, visual performance during driving and neuropsychologica l visuospatial test performance were compared and related. Visuospatial tests were a priori classified in four visuospatial sets, and were evaluated on three measures, namely lateralisation, speed, and accuracy. Driving safety and fluency was assessed by means of a practical test-ride and scored using a structured protocol. It was concluded that HH cannot be considered a definite contraindication for holding a drivers' licence since not all patients failed the testride. The most frequent remark made by the driving expert was a lack of stability in steering. It was found that visual performance during driving was significantly related to visuospatial test performance, operationally defined as a function of typical visual HH disability. A specific combination of the lateralisation, speed and accuracy measures of the visuospatial sets explained 77% of the variance in visual performance during driving.

show abstract

“…Two or more omissions in crossing out on the three left (18 lines) or right columns (18 lines) in a non-time constrained test indicate nonnormality [43]. The letter cancellation task (LetCcl) from the Behavioural Inattention Test (BIT) battery contains five rows of 34 letters of which 40% are targets (E, R) to cancel out without a time limit [16].…”

Section: Neuropsychological Measuresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Self-rehabilitation with a game

Knoche¹,

Hald²,

Richter³

et al. 2017

EAI Endorsed Transactions on Pervasive Health and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

We designed and evaluated a whack-a-mole (WAM) style game (see Figure 1) in a clinical randomized controlled trial (RCT) with reminder-assisted but self-initiated use over the period of a month with 43 participants from a post-lesion pool. While game play did not moderate rehabilitative progress indices of standard neuropsychological control tests, it did significantly improve in-game performance when compared to the control group. Its performance indicators and interaction data were highly accurate in predicting neglect and which hand the patients used for input. Patients found playing beneficial to their rehabilitation and attributed gains in the attention training properties of the game. The game showed potential for bedside assessment, insight support, and motivation by providing knowledge about rehabilitative progress.

show abstract

Evaluation of left visuospatial neglect: Norms and discrimination power of two tests.

Cited by 121 publications

References 16 publications

Driving With Hemianopia: IV. Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections in a Simulator

Driving With Hemianopia: IV. Head Scanning and Detection at Intersections in a Simulator

Driving and visuospatial performance in people with hemianopia

Self-rehabilitation with a game

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About