Evaluation of Learning in Art

Burkhart, Robert C.

doi:10.2307/3190688

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…For example, Godfrey (1964) asserts that self evaluation through self reflection is the best alternative in evaluation in art. Similarly, Burkhart (1965) maintains that from 1957 on there was a movement away from the notion of developing aesthetic criteria for evaluating art products, to one based on the nature of the individual student's strategies and procedures.…”

Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As Burkhart (1965) points out, the problem is in deciding the meaning of an aesthetic judgement. As I see it, especially among North American art educators, the problem seems to lie in confusion between aesthetic and educational judgements, and a lack of confidence in making aesthetic judgements.…”

Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…It is essentially the educational value of aesthetic judgements which is held in question, as well as the validity of the aesthetic judgement itself. For example, Burkhart (1965) states explicitly that judgements about art products are problematic as they are subjective. This, Burkhart maintains, is because no objective or stable aesthetic criteria can be applied to the evaluation of art products.…”

Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Philosophical Bases for Conceptions of Senior Secondary Level Student Evaluation in Art Education in Britain and North America

Blaikie¹

1991

Marilyn Zurmuehlen Working Papers in Art Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Purpose Of the Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Statement Of the Problemmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Philosophical Bases for Conceptions of Senior Secondary Level Student Evaluation in Art Education in Britain and North America

Blaikie¹

1991

Marilyn Zurmuehlen Working Papers in Art Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Magnetohydrodynamics

Kessler

2000

Kirk-Othmer Encyclopedia of Chemical Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) power generation is possible when an electrically conducting fluid such as a hot ionized gas passes through a magnetic field under the appropriate conditions. In electric utility power generation, a magnetohydrodynamic generator is combined with a conventional steam turbine. The system is a combined cycle; the fuel of interest is typically pulverized coal. Environmental intrusion from MHD plants is projected to be minimal. The fundamentals and system components of MHD power generation are discussed, including the geometries of various MHD generators, types of electrodes and magnets used, materials of component construction, interfaces between the MHD generator and the steam turbine, effect of type of fuel utilized, and the efficiency and economic factors of proposed plants. Projects under development in the United States and around the world are presented.

show abstract

Approaches to Secondary Studio Art Assessment in North America: 1970–1993

Blaikie¹

1994

Journal of Art & Design Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The paper analyses the visible approaches to secondary studio art assessment in North America. First, standardised testing is discussed, in particular the National Assessment of Educational Progress in the United States. In spite of opposition there is continued support for this strategy, evident in several state‐wide initiatives. As well, qualitative assessment of secondary studio art is being undertaken in individual schools throughout North America. Visible models of this approach are the Advanced Placement, International Baccalaureate, and Arts PROPEL. The findings are that qualitative assessment is based on written and visual materials presented in portfolios; norm and criterion referencing are combined; criteria are derived from course content, and with the exception of Arts PROPEL, final judgements are made intersubjectively. These models offer alternatives to the standardised testing model, and attest to the cross‐germination of ideas on qualitative studio assessment internationally.

show abstract

Evaluation of Learning in Art

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Philosophical Bases for Conceptions of Senior Secondary Level Student Evaluation in Art Education in Britain and North America

Philosophical Bases for Conceptions of Senior Secondary Level Student Evaluation in Art Education in Britain and North America

Magnetohydrodynamics

Approaches to Secondary Studio Art Assessment in North America: 1970–1993

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About