2013
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)gt.1943-5606.0000831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Lateral Load Capacity of Bored Piles in Weathered Granite Soil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several studies in the technical literature which deal with large-scale enlarged base piers or belled piers resisting the uplift load in sand (Choi et al 2013;Gaaver 2013). They stated that the breakout factors in sand are function of the anchor shape, embedment ratio and the shearing resistance of the soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several studies in the technical literature which deal with large-scale enlarged base piers or belled piers resisting the uplift load in sand (Choi et al 2013;Gaaver 2013). They stated that the breakout factors in sand are function of the anchor shape, embedment ratio and the shearing resistance of the soil.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, the good estimate of the lateral pile capacity relies on the accurate measurement of the soil-water retention behaviour. Conversely, a higher discrepancy (>20%) between measured and predicted values is observed for two of the three piles tested by Choi et al [14]. This difference may be due to the lack of information about the variation of suction with depth, which was not provided by the authors.…”
Section: Validation Against Field Datamentioning
confidence: 72%
“…The proposed method has been validated against field tests on free head short rigid piles embedded in three distinct unsaturated soils, i.e. a weathered granite [14], a sand with clay and silt [15] and a fine sand [16], . In all cases, the water table was deeper than the toe of the pile (𝑧 𝑤 > 𝐿) so that the unsaturated reacting depth coincides with the pile length (i.e.…”
Section: Validation Against Field Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Designing methods for IAB assume that soil spring exhibits equal linear response despite the widely-known fact that it is nonlinear and hysteretic. Current soil resistance methods to predict soil resistance is, API methods, Hansen's and Broms approaches offer varying predictions of soil resistance for the similar earth environments [88][89][90][91]. Of these ways, the foremost refined square measure API ways utilized by the industry in nonlinear soil modeling for lateral pile loading.…”
Section: Api Design Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%