2018
DOI: 10.3171/2018.2.peds17694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of lateral atlantodental interval asymmetry in the pediatric age group: normative values

Abstract: OBJECTIVEThe revelation of normative radiographic measurements for the developing pediatric spine is incomplete. The purpose of this analysis was to determine the normal range of asymmetry of the lateral atlantodental interval (LADI) and define age- and sex-related differences.METHODSA total of 3072 children aged 0–18 years who underwent CT scanning of the cervical spine were identified at Riley Hospital f… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…evaluated 540 pediatric non-trauma cervical CT exams and found a mean difference in right and left lateral ADI as .09 +/− 1.23 mm with maximal asymmetry of 4.87 mm. 25 In our 27 patient cohort with TAL injury on cervical MRI, only 14% of patients demonstrated a lateral ADI greater than 2 mm with a maximum lateral ADI of 4 mm in one patient; hence, our findings suggest no measurable difference in lateral ADI between non-trauma patients and those with TAL injuries ( Figure 5 ). Although no known normative values for C1 lateral mass offset have been established on cervical CT, combined C1 LMO greater than 6.9 mm in the setting of a C1 ring fracture—known as the “Rule of Spence”—is still used to help predict TAL injury; however, more recent research studies using cervical MRI have found that this criteria drastically underestimates associated TAL injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…evaluated 540 pediatric non-trauma cervical CT exams and found a mean difference in right and left lateral ADI as .09 +/− 1.23 mm with maximal asymmetry of 4.87 mm. 25 In our 27 patient cohort with TAL injury on cervical MRI, only 14% of patients demonstrated a lateral ADI greater than 2 mm with a maximum lateral ADI of 4 mm in one patient; hence, our findings suggest no measurable difference in lateral ADI between non-trauma patients and those with TAL injuries ( Figure 5 ). Although no known normative values for C1 lateral mass offset have been established on cervical CT, combined C1 LMO greater than 6.9 mm in the setting of a C1 ring fracture—known as the “Rule of Spence”—is still used to help predict TAL injury; however, more recent research studies using cervical MRI have found that this criteria drastically underestimates associated TAL injuries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%