Evaluation of Land Consolidation and Renovation Processin the Decayed Textures: A Case of Study the Nezamabad Neighborhood in Tehran

Abstract

Decayed textures have been one of the most important issues and challenges of Tehran's urban management in the last two decades. Therefore, numerous and varied policies, programs, and actions have been adopted and implemented in these decayed areas. The land consolidation is one of the approaches of the renovation of the old and decayed urban texture of Tehran based on resolution 300/310/15301 dated 24/07/2006 of the Supreme Council of Urban Planning and Architecture of Iran and clauses 9-5 of the detailed design rules and regulations finely executed. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the process of land consolidation in the renovation of the urban decayed texture of the Nizamabad neighborhood in zone 1, district 7 of Tehran Municipality. Most of the information required for this research was collected by the field study method. The respondent sampling of this study consisted of the developers, experts, fine-grained unit owners of the combined fine-grained parts of this neighborhood. SPSS software was used to analyze the descriptive data. Chi-Square and Friedman nonparametric statistical tests were used depending on the type of data, the scale of variables and goals. According to the results of this study, the process of implementation of consolidation renovation in the Nizamabad neighborhood has been faced with numerous and various damages.

Investigating the effective indicators on the realization of good governance in border cities: A Case Study of Paveh, Iran

“…While traditional urban management predominantly emphasized the e cient allocation of resources for service delivery within municipal structures, administrative systems, planning processes, and policy implementation methods (Mantiñán et al, 2019), urban governance takes a more holistic approach by integrating urban management and government at the local level (municipality or local government), as underscored by Ripp and Rodwell (2016). This approach, often referred to as optimal urban governance, has garnered widespread recognition as the most effective, cost-e cient, and sustainable method for urban management practices, as advocated by (Bull and Jones, 2006;Pieterse et al, 2018;Washbourne et al, 2021;Kamanrudi et al, 2020).…”