2016
DOI: 10.18869/acadpub.sjimu.24.5.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus Effect on the Aflatoxin M1 Reduction in Probiotic Yogurt

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these studies, aflatoxin was bound by the tested bacterial strains in the range of 14-49%, 20.88-59.44% and 0-85%, respectively (Hernandez-Mendoza et al, 2009;Huang et al, 2017;Kumar et al, 2018). On the basis of the studies conducted, Tajalli et al (2014) declared that more than 92% of AFM1 was detoxified by Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Elgerbi et al (2006) reported that 73.1% of AFM1 was bounded after 96 h of incubation by strains of Lactobacillus, Lactococcus and Bifidobacterium spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, aflatoxin was bound by the tested bacterial strains in the range of 14-49%, 20.88-59.44% and 0-85%, respectively (Hernandez-Mendoza et al, 2009;Huang et al, 2017;Kumar et al, 2018). On the basis of the studies conducted, Tajalli et al (2014) declared that more than 92% of AFM1 was detoxified by Lactobacillus rhamnosus. Elgerbi et al (2006) reported that 73.1% of AFM1 was bounded after 96 h of incubation by strains of Lactobacillus, Lactococcus and Bifidobacterium spp.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%