2016
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Knowledge and Practices Regarding Cholera, Water Treatment, Hygiene, and Sanitation Before and After an Oral Cholera Vaccination Campaign—Haiti, 2013–2014

Abstract: In 2013, the Government of Haiti implemented its first oral cholera vaccine (OCV) campaign in Petite Anse, an urban setting, and Cerca Carvajal, a rural commune. We conducted and compared responses to two independent cross-sectional knowledge and practices household surveys pre- (N = 297) and post- (N = 302) OCV campaign in Petite Anse. No significant differences in knowledge about causes, symptoms, and prevention of cholera were noted. Compared with precampaign respondents, fewer postcampaign respondents repo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As OCV campaigns expand, there is interest in knowing how OCV campaigns impact WASH practices; results to date have been disparate. In Haiti, fewer postcampaign respondents reported treating and covering their drinking water and no significant changes in handwashing practice or cholera knowledge were reported 1 year after the campaign [ 35 ]. Conversely, in Papua New Guinea, respondents in vaccinated areas were more likely to have received cholera knowledge, and no significant differences in water, sanitation, and hygiene practices were observed 5 months after the campaign [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As OCV campaigns expand, there is interest in knowing how OCV campaigns impact WASH practices; results to date have been disparate. In Haiti, fewer postcampaign respondents reported treating and covering their drinking water and no significant changes in handwashing practice or cholera knowledge were reported 1 year after the campaign [ 35 ]. Conversely, in Papua New Guinea, respondents in vaccinated areas were more likely to have received cholera knowledge, and no significant differences in water, sanitation, and hygiene practices were observed 5 months after the campaign [ 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, one difference identified is that Gressier participants received general health education in significantly higher proportions than those in Léogâne. The association between water and health is a present concern to residents of Gressier and Léogâne [26] and researchers have conducted health education campaigns about the association in the past, albeit in different communities [27]. Therefore, it is possible that receiving health information changed participant water practices, though the absolute difference of 11% indicates that this may only have minimal effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(33) The other three articles all focused on knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) related to water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) in the midst of the cholera outbreak. (34)(35)(36) Thus, the existing body of research about the cholera outbreak lacks empirical documentation of the experiences and perceptions of Haitian community members themselves. Much has happened since the majority of existing articles were published -undeniable genetic proof that the cholera strain was from Nepal, a formal apology by the UN for its role in introducing cholera to Haiti, a UN plan for assistance in Haiti, and lack of progress towards realizing that plan.…”
Section: Purposementioning
confidence: 99%