2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.funbio.2019.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of ITS2 molecular morphometrics effectiveness in species delimitation of Ascomycota – A pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subsequently, the secondary structure of ITS2 was determined using Homology Modelling (HM) of the ITS2 (Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 Ribosomal RNA Database) Workbench ( ) access date 18 May 2021, with a default setting at 75% threshold for helix transfer similarity. A gap open penalty of 20 and a gap extension penalty of 4 were used for the transfer helices [ 65 , 66 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, the secondary structure of ITS2 was determined using Homology Modelling (HM) of the ITS2 (Internal Transcribed Spacer 2 Ribosomal RNA Database) Workbench ( ) access date 18 May 2021, with a default setting at 75% threshold for helix transfer similarity. A gap open penalty of 20 and a gap extension penalty of 4 were used for the transfer helices [ 65 , 66 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ref. [47] explored the utility of ITS2 molecular morphometrics for delineating Ascomycota species, emphasizing the effectiveness of this approach in elucidating fungal species boundaries and potentially easing challenges associated with molecular characterization. Integration of secondary structure information with primary sequencing data significantly enhances species identification within plant genera and sheds light on their evolutionary history.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We take these results as independent support for the proposed species list (Table 4), but it is admissible that part of those twelve LSU-only clades might be considered for merging with others, especially as the respective ITS sequences become known. We wanted to explore the possible utility of RNA secondary structure reconstructions as a new level of phylogenetic support, as has been done in a variety of contexts (Zhuang and Liu 2012;Kapoor et al 2018;Sundaresan et al 2019). Our use of RNAalifold (Bernhart et al 2008) aimed at verifying, within the framework of the collected sequences, whether the taxonomic results from the onedimensional (sequence-only) analyses could be reinforced by working with the secondary structures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%