2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.12.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Irrigant Flow in the Root Canal Using Different Needle Types by an Unsteady Computational Fluid Dynamics Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
182
1
23

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 188 publications
(235 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(39 reference statements)
16
182
1
23
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in this study are in accordance with Boutsioukis et al 2010 6 , in that the monoject system showed significantly lower apical pressure via computational dynamic model method. Our study showed that a few teeth demonstrated small number of apical extrusion depicted as pixels in the monoject system compared to the hypodermic using coloredagar discoloration technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The results in this study are in accordance with Boutsioukis et al 2010 6 , in that the monoject system showed significantly lower apical pressure via computational dynamic model method. Our study showed that a few teeth demonstrated small number of apical extrusion depicted as pixels in the monoject system compared to the hypodermic using coloredagar discoloration technique.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…One of the advantages of syringe irrigation is that it allows comparatively easy control of the depth of needle penetration within the canal and the volume of irrigant that is flushed through the canal [7,8].…”
Section: Needle-tip Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irrigants have been traditionally applied by a syringe and needle (13). Adequate contact of the irrigant with the dentinal walls is enabled because most of the irrigant is potentiated only around the tip of the needle in combination with high surface tension of sodium hypochlorite (14,15). That is why many various combinations of disinfecting solutions and irrigation devices such as photo-activated disinfection (16), active root canal irrigation (17,18) and intracanal laser application (19) as well as ozone or plasma devices have been used (21,21,22).…”
Section: Janković I Surmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Njihov potpuni kontakt sa zidom korijenskog kanala onemogućen je jer se glavnina irigansa usmjerava kroz vrh igle i to samo sredinom kanala, ali i zbog velike površinske napetosti otopine natrijeva hipoklorita (14,15). Zato su danas razvijene mnogobrojne tehnike irigacije korijenskih kanala, kao što je dezinfekcija foto-aktivacijom (16), aktivna irigacija kanala (17,18), primjena lasera u kanalima (19) i uređaji koji generiraju plazmu ili ozon (20,21,22).…”
Section: Janković I Surunclassified