Evaluation of IPO-firm takeovers: an event study

Abstract

The acquisition of innovative and entrepreneurial firms has become an important issue in gaining competition advantages. While there exists a fruitful and promising literature analyzing M&A activities in general, there is only limited evidence available on the acquisitions of high-tech start-ups and entrepreneurial firms by larger incumbents. This study addresses this issue and focuses on acquisitions targeted at public IPO firms. Our main interest is whether and how the stock market evaluates the specific human capital of the CEO and founder of the entrepreneurial target firm. While in general target firms assets are positively evaluated by market participants, this should not necessarily hold for assets owned by the founder of the target firm. The findings clearly show that stock market participants positively evaluate target firms intangible assets, as measured by patents. But that also the opposite holds if the assets are under control of the founder CEO. Our results thus strongly support conclusions derived from property rights or incomplete contract theory on joined ownership of assets and performance. We conclude that the acquirer's post-acquisition performance strongly depends on the continued access to the targets' specific intangible assets, which is not necessarily the case for the founder's specific human capital.Keywords Ownership structure Á High-tech IPO firms Á Mergers and acquisitions Á Event study Á Founder-specific human capital JEL Classifications F23 Á G34 Á L21 Á L26

Entrepreneurial ecosystems: a dynamic lifecycle model

“…At the same time, established firms have to renew and redefine their routines and norms towards a "corporate entrepreneurship" culture (Kuratko et al, 1990(Kuratko et al, , 2014(Kuratko et al, , 2015Covin & Miles, 1999). Takeovers of startup and entrepreneurial firms now allow for acquiring innovations, such as new and sophisticated variations of products or services already offered by incumbents (Fabel, 2004;Henkel et al, 2015;Lehmann and Schwerdtfeger, 2016), that already have proven their viability and subsequently can be brought to the market by exploiting incumbents' advantages such as broader resource bases, sufficient funding, and economies of scale and scope in production, and other value chain activities. The tendency to re-integrate entrepreneurial firms characterizes the end of the second phase.…”

“…Investor confidence begins to wane, financial capital becomes harder to access, and IPO activities start declining (Meoli et al, 2013;Bonardo et al, 2010). At the same time, established companies increase their effort to re-integrate entrepreneurial firms, leading to a win-win situation for both, entrepreneurial firms and incumbent firms (Lehmann & Schwerdtfeger, 2016). While young and entrepreneurial firms' innovation endeavors are assumed to be more likely to create breakthroughs, these firms often fail to bring their innovations to the market.…”

“…In order to pursue their "corporate entrepreneurship" strategy (see Ireland et al, 2009), incumbent firms strongly depend on absorbing and exploiting new technologies and innovations. Thus, with respect to the proposed specialization among technology-based start-ups and technology-seeking incumbent firms in the market for innovation, incumbent firms enjoy competitive advantages in the commercial exploitation of innovations, while start-up firms enjoy advantages in their exploration (Lehmann & Schwerdtfeger, 2016;Henkel et al, 2015).…”

The determinants of ownership in M&As: An analysis of the stake purchases in Romanian acquisitions

“…Thus, the firms that go public are easy to be acquired because they don't use, in the first place, the most common takeover defenses (poison pill securities or staggered boards, the latter being also an effective mechanism against proxy fighting). Using a complete opposite approach, Lehmann and Schwerdtfeger (2016) consider that takeovers of IPO firms it's actually a win-win situation, especially in the case of small companies which fall under market for corporate control theory.…”

Smart finance for smart places to foster new venture creation

“…The access to venture capital is an essential driver of the success of new entrepreneurial firms (Colombo & Grilli, 2010;Manigart & Wright, 2013), and a strong complement to exit strategies like an IPO (Meoli, Paleari, & Vismara, 2013;Vismara, Paleari, & Ritter, 2012) or M&A (Lehmann & Schwerdtfeger, 2016;.…”