2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.asr.2017.01.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of ionospheric height assumption for single station GPS-TEC derivation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While many studies have investigated methods for estimating [16][17][18][19][20] and forecasting the ionospheric VTEC [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] based on GNSS observing data, very little work has been done on using Long term GNSS observation data from an equatorial ionization anomaly region for high precision estimation and prediction of the ionospheric VTEC. Two experiments were carried out in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While many studies have investigated methods for estimating [16][17][18][19][20] and forecasting the ionospheric VTEC [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] based on GNSS observing data, very little work has been done on using Long term GNSS observation data from an equatorial ionization anomaly region for high precision estimation and prediction of the ionospheric VTEC. Two experiments were carried out in this study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-precision ionospheric TEC estimation requires an accurate calculation of the system hardware delay (i.e., differential code bias or DCB) of the receiver and satellite. Currently, the main solution methods are the grid condition constraint, polynomial model, spherical harmonic function methods [16][17][18], as well as the Kalman method [19,20]. In low-latitude regions, particularly in the equatorial anomaly region, ionospheric TEC results obtained using the above system hardware delay solution method cannot accurately reflect the real changes in the ionospheric TEC in the region, which adversely affect the accuracy in the performance of ionospheric TEC prediction models [21,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the beginning of "VTEC result" section, we assume that the height of ionospheric shell is fixed at 400 km to simplify the calculation. But actually, the height of the ionospheric shell always changes with time and place (Wang et al 2016;Lu et al 2017). For PSGM, the change of shell height parameter is easier to map IPPs to different grids under different satellite elevation than PBGM.…”
Section: Shell Height Parameter Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lanyi and Roth [21] proposed a polynomial model for single-station TEC derivation, and a single-station receiver bias can be estimated while using this model [22]. This method was used by Lu et al [23] to study the effects of ionospheric shell height on GPS-based TEC derivation by a single station, while Kao et al [24] applied this method to multi-stations. Chen et al [25] analyzed the applicability of the sophisticated Klobuchar model for VTEC in China.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%