2010
DOI: 10.1063/1.3449541
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of ion collection area in Faraday probes

Abstract: A Faraday probe with three concentric rings was designed and fabricated to assess the effect of gap width and collector diameter in a systematic study of the diagnostic ion collection area. The nested Faraday probe consisted of two concentric collector rings and an outer guard ring, which enabled simultaneous current density measurements on the inner and outer collectors. Two versions of the outer collector were fabricated to create gaps of 0.5 and 1.5 mm between the rings. Distribution of current density in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Ion current densities in the exhaust plume are obtained using measurement sweeps of a Faraday probe (FP). 27 The current collecting surface of the probe is mounted flush within a guard-ring, which is used to minimize the error due to sheath effects on the collection area. Current is collected through a shunt resistor for probe and guard-ring bias voltages of −30 V.…”
Section: Iib Plasma Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Ion current densities in the exhaust plume are obtained using measurement sweeps of a Faraday probe (FP). 27 The current collecting surface of the probe is mounted flush within a guard-ring, which is used to minimize the error due to sheath effects on the collection area. Current is collected through a shunt resistor for probe and guard-ring bias voltages of −30 V.…”
Section: Iib Plasma Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integrate current density from the Faraday probe allows determination of the plume divergence angle following the procedures outlined by Brown and Gallimore. 19,20 The plume divergence angle for the conditions shown here is given in Table I.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The beam current and plume divergence angle are determined from Faraday probe measurements according to the technique developed by Brown and Gallimore. 19,20 The uncertainty in the plume angle and beam current are 65%. The ion energy systematic error is 65.3 V.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This Faraday probe is described in detail by Liang and Gallimore, 21 and is modeled after the nested Faraday probe design described by Brown and Gallimore. 24 The Faraday probe was mounted to a rotation stage such that it could move in an arc about the HHT exit plane. To take data, the guard ring and both collectors are biased at -30 V with respect to facility ground into ion saturation.…”
Section: Faraday Probementioning
confidence: 99%