2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.05.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Intravesical Prostatic Protrusion as a Predictor of Dutasteride-Resistant Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms/Benign Prostatic Enlargement With a High Likelihood of Surgical Intervention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
13
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Chia et al reported that IPP of >16 mm was associated with a higher BOO index. A greater length of IPP was also related to a lower response to medical treatment including α ‐blockers and dutasteride . Mariappan et al noted that patients with greater IPP had a lower success rate of decatheterization after acute urinary retention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chia et al reported that IPP of >16 mm was associated with a higher BOO index. A greater length of IPP was also related to a lower response to medical treatment including α ‐blockers and dutasteride . Mariappan et al noted that patients with greater IPP had a lower success rate of decatheterization after acute urinary retention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be examined non‐invasively by transabdominal ultrasonography. IPP has been known as a predictor of efficacy not only for medical treatment such as an α‐1 blocker and dutasteride but also for surgical intervention . The IPP, however, is not always the same shape because the middle lobe and/or lateral lobes sometimes protrude into the bladder.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They enrolled 218 patients for 6 months or more on a combination medical therapy. During follow up 21% needed surgical intervention and IPP (odds ratio 1.133, p < 0.001) was the strongest independent factor predicting conversion to surgical intervention [22] .…”
Section: Ipp As a Predictor Of Medical Treatment Effectmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Tamsulosin therapy may be more effective in improving IPSS and Q max in patients with mild IPP than in those with moderate or severe IPP [34]. Moreover, Hirayama et al [35] deduced that combination therapy (i.e., α 1 -blockers and dutasteride) has insufficient efficacy towards LUTS and/or BPH with severe IPP due to a low proportion of stromal components in the prostate. For these reasons, well-designed studies are needed to assess the effect of IPP on the scope of treatment.…”
Section: Clinical Evaluation and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%