2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2007.01850.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of intragranular misorientation parameters measured by EBSD in a hot worked austenitic stainless steel

Abstract: SummaryAn extensive characterization of hot deformed austenitic stainless steel was carried out using the electron backscatter diffraction technique. Special emphasis was given to the misorientation parameters related to different length scales. These parameters show a behaviour that is sensitive to the amount of applied strain and also lead to increasing values for both the strain and the scale length.At the same time, the use of different thresholds and scan steps in the evaluation of the parameters were ana… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of the alternating orientation in the microbands, the misorientation does not accumulate across the deformed grain. [24] B. Microstructural Evolution at 1273 K (1000°C)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence of the alternating orientation in the microbands, the misorientation does not accumulate across the deformed grain. [24] B. Microstructural Evolution at 1273 K (1000°C)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This small point-to-point misorientation with a large cumulative misorientation signifies the formation of geometrically necessary boundaries (GNBs) inside the deformed grain. [24] The GNBs are formed to ensure the plastic strain compatibility between neighboring grains as well as to accommodate plastic strain gradients. [25,26] The misorientation profile over a distance CD across another deformed grain on the same sample (Figure 2(c)) is shown in Figure 2(d).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3,12] Comparing present ( Figure 4) and former results, it is remarkable that, in spite of the difference in materials, deformation modes, conditions, and techniques, a common trend is observed and the evolution of the dislocation density is not essentially different from the one exhibited by the Kernel average misorientation or by other EBSD ingrain misorientation parameters. [9,35] The reversal produces some net dissolution of the ingrain microstructure during roughly the first half of the transient and a net reconstruction during the second half. It has to be noted that at the Bauschinger strain, the microstructural parameters are slightly lower than the corresponding ones at the prestrain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, clear tendencies of the different EBSD parameters with strain path were recorded. [9,35] Here, only two of these parameters will be considered: the Kernel average misorientation, K aver , and the fraction in length of the R3 boundaries (twin boundaries), F R3 . A step size of 0.5 lm was applied.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La severidad de dichos gradientes, y por ende la heterogeneidad en la deformación plástica dentro de los granos, pueden determinarse a partir de varios parámetros [1,[15][16][17][18], entre los cuales uno de los más usados es la desorientación promedio en núcleos, KAM (Kernel Average Misorientation) [5,19]. Este índice, que resulta dependiente del tamaño de paso con el que se efectúa la medición [20,21], puede usarse para estimar densidad de dislocaciones geométricamente necesarias, compatible con el campo de tensiones presentes en el material [22,23].…”
unclassified