Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and penetration of <scp>bioceramic‐based</scp> sealers in oval root canals: A confocal laser scanning microscope study

Chew, Soo Teng; Eshak, Zolkapli; Al‐Haddad, Afaf

doi:10.1002/jemt.24323

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“… 22 , 23 Therefore, the small particle size and greater fluidity of the C 3 S-BG-P and Nishika allowed their better adaptation to root canal walls. Chew et al 30 compared three different sealers (EndoSeal MTA, CeraSeal, and Nishika Canal Sealer BG) with an AH Plus in oval root canals. Through the evaluation of the interfacial adaptability and depth of penetration at 3, 6, and 9 mm root sections from the apex under a confocal laser scanning microscope, they concluded that Nishika resulted in superior penetration and adaptation than the other tested sealers due to its superior physicochemical properties and fine particle size.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interfacial adaptation of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer

Al-Sabawi,

Al-Jubori

2024

J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background. The sealer’s interfacial adaptability is one of the critical factors for successful root canal therapy. This study evaluated and compared the interfacial adaptability of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer (C3 S-BG-P) to root dentin with two bioactive sealers Nishika Canal Sealer BG and BioRootTM RCS. Methods. Thirty newly extracted single-rooted lower premolars were decoronated and instrumented. The roots were assigned to three groups: C3 S-BG-P, Nishika Canal Sealer BG, and BioRootTM RCS (n=10) and obturated with the single-cone method. Each root was sectioned horizontally to obtain three slices at 2, 5, and 10 mm from the apex. The width of the gaps at the sealer‒dentin interface from each section’s mesial and distal sides was measured under a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) at×1.0 using the Digimizer software program. One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests for multiple comparisons were used to interpret and analyze the collected data. Results. The mean gap width at the sealer‒dentin interface of C3 S-BG-P and Nishika Canal Sealer BG was significantly less than that of BioRootTM RCS at all root sections (P≤0.05). However, the mean gap width at the sealer‒dentin interface of C3 S-BG-P was not significantly different from Nishika Canal Sealer BG (P>0.05). Moreover, there were greater interfacial gaps at the apical level than at the coronal level for all the tested sealers. Conclusion. C3 S-BG-P exhibited interfacial adaptation that was nearly comparable to Nishika Canal Sealer BG and superior to BioRootTM RCS.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Interfacial adaptation of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer

Al-Sabawi,

Al-Jubori

2024

J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Adaptation to the canal wall and penetration depth of the sealers CeraSeal, EndoSeal MTA, Nishika Canal Sealer BG and AH Plus have been studied [ 94 ]. Three levels, apical (3 mm from apex), middle (6 mm from the apex) and coronal (9 mm from the apex) were measured.…”

Section: Sealers and Cements Used In Endodontic Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

“…For the penetration depth, there were significant differences only at the coronal level. Nishika Canal Sealer BG had higher penetration depth than AH Plus and EndoSeal MTA, whereas CeraSeal showed higher penetration depths than EndoSeal MTA [ 94 ].…”

Section: Sealers and Cements Used In Endodontic Practicementioning

confidence: 99%

Biological properties versus solubility of endodontic sealers and cements

Fristad,

Haug,

Bårdsen

2024

BIiD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Endodontic sealers and cements used in root canal treatment have different compositions and properties. Common to all materials is that their primary goal is to fill gaps and voids, making a permanent seal of the root canal system. Furthermore, aspects such as antibacterial properties, cytotoxicity, setting time, solubility and biocompatibility are also crucial and ought to be considered. Over the years, a shift in the view on the importance of these aspects has ocurred. Whereas the antibacterial properties were considered important when the technical factors in endodontics were less developed, the sealing ability and biocompatibility have later been considered the most critical factors. The introduction of tricalcium silicate cements and sealers has led to a renewed interest in material properties, as these cements seem to have good sealing ability and at the same time combine favourable antimicrobial effects with excellent biocompatibility. This review discusses how the various properties of root canal sealers and cements may conflict with the primary aim of providing a permanent seal of the root canal system.

show abstract

Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using different sealers and techniques of obturation in 237 patients: A retrospective study

Radwanski,

Pietrzycka,

Eyüboğlu

et al. 2024

Clin Oral Invest

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the clinical results of two root canal sealers and three obturation techniques used for non-surgical root canal treatment. Materials and methods A total of two hundred eighty-three root canal treated teeth in two hundred thirty-seven patients with minimum a 6-month follow-up was included for this study. The canals were filled with three different modes: 1) cold lateral condensation (CLC) and AH Plus Sealer; 2) continuous wave condensation technique (CWC) and AH Plus Sealer, and 3) sealer-based obturation technique (SBO) and AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer. The treatment outcome was analysed based on clinical signs and symptoms, and periapical radiograph (periapical index, PAI). Results There were no significant differences in treatment outcome between various sealers and filling techniques applied. The sealer extrusion was found most frequently in the CWC group (60.67%), followed by SBO (59.21%) and CLC (21.19%) with statistically significant differences (p < .05). The initial diagnosis, previous treatment and sealer extrusion (p < .05) were prognostic factors that affected treatment outcome. Conclusions Based on the findings of this study, neither the sealer type nor the filling technique affected the treatment success while preoperative diagnosis, previous treatment and sealer extrusion had significant effect on the outcome. Clinical relevance A bioceramic sealant applied along with the single-cone technique might be considered as an alternative method in root canal obturation.

show abstract

Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and penetration of bioceramic‐based sealers in oval root canals: A confocal laser scanning microscope study

Cited by 4 publications

References 50 publications

Interfacial adaptation of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer

Interfacial adaptation of newly prepared nano-tricalcium silicate-58s bioactive glass-based endodontic sealer

Biological properties versus solubility of endodontic sealers and cements

Clinical outcome of non-surgical root canal treatment using different sealers and techniques of obturation in 237 patients: A retrospective study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About