Evaluation of interfacial adaptation and penetration of bioceramic‐based sealers in oval root canals: A confocal laser scanning microscope study

Abstract

To assess the interfacial adaptation and penetration depth of three different bioceramic‐based sealers (CeraSeal, EndoSeal MTA, Nishika Canal Sealer BG) compared to an epoxy resin‐based sealer (AH Plus) in oval root canals. Fourty extracted single‐rooted mandibular premolar with oval canal were prepared and randomly allocated according to the obturation into; CeraSeal, EndoSeal MTA, Nishika Canal Sealer BG and AH Plus. The roots were sectioned at 3, 6 and 9 mm from the apex. The sealer adaptation and the penetration depth were evaluated under confocal laser scanning microscope. One‐way ANOVA and Repeated measure ANOVA were used to statistically analyze the data. Nishika Canal Sealer BG showed significantly higher sealer adaptation than EndoSeal MTA (P < .001) at apical and middle thirds. Meanwhile, AH Plus showed significantly higher sealer adaptation than EndoSeal MTA (P = 0.011) at middle third. For sealer penetration, Nishika Canal Sealer BG showed the longest sealer penetration that was significant compared to AH Plus (P < .001) and EndoSeal MTA (P < .001) whereas CeraSeal was significantly higher than EndoSeal MTA (P = 0.029) at coronal third. For AH Plus, there was a significant less sealer penetration at coronal third compared to apical and middle thirds (P < .05). Whereas for EndoSeal MTA, the coronal third has significant less penetration compared to the middle third (P = 0.032). Endoseal has the lowest adaptation and penetration depth. Nishika Canal Sealer BG has better adaptation and penetration depth using single cone obturation technique in oval canal. Research Highlights All the tested root canal sealers have some percentage of gaps and vary in their penetration capability into dentinal tubules. Nishika Canal Sealer BG has significantly better sealer adaptation to root dentinal walls than that of EndoSeal MTA at the apical and middle third but not significantly different from other type of sealers used. Nishika Canal Sealer BG has significantly better penetration depth than AH Plus and EndoSeal MTA at the coronal third of radicular dentin.

Biological properties versus solubility of endodontic sealers and cements

“…For the penetration depth, there were significant differences only at the coronal level. Nishika Canal Sealer BG had higher penetration depth than AH Plus and EndoSeal MTA, whereas CeraSeal showed higher penetration depths than EndoSeal MTA [94].…”

“…Adaptation to the canal wall and penetration depth of the sealers CeraSeal, EndoSeal MTA, Nishika Canal Sealer BG and AH Plus have been studied [94]. Three levels, apical (3 mm from apex), middle (6 mm from the apex) and coronal (9 mm from the apex) were measured.…”