2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-011-0431-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Interest Point Detectors and Feature Descriptors for Visual Tracking

Abstract: Applications for real-time visual tracking can be found in many areas, including visual odometry and augmented reality. Interest point detection and feature description form the basis of feature-based tracking, and a variety of algorithms for these tasks have been proposed. In this work, we present (1) a carefully designed dataset of video sequences of planar textures with ground truth, which includes various geometric changes, lighting conditions, and levels of motion blur, and which may serve as a testbed fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
241
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 374 publications
(250 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
(147 reference statements)
5
241
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first is a set of video sequences with continuous motion used for evaluation of detectors and descriptors for visual tracking, from the University of California, Santa Barbara [7]. This dataset includes videos of six different planar tracking targets and several different motion patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first is a set of video sequences with continuous motion used for evaluation of detectors and descriptors for visual tracking, from the University of California, Santa Barbara [7]. This dataset includes videos of six different planar tracking targets and several different motion patterns.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature-based methods (i) detect key-points like corners and only extract feature descriptors from their vicinity; (ii) perform complex transformations into feature descriptors and match feature descriptors between images; and (iii) typically require high-resolution images [1][2][3][4][5]. A number of feature detectors and descriptors have been developed, examples being the wide-spread FAST detector [6] and the SIFT [7] and SURF detectors and descriptors [8], and the modern binary descriptors such as BRIEF [9,10], ORB [11], or FREAK [12].…”
Section: Feature-based Vs Holistic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we think that the insights on illumination tolerance for different distance measures gained in this paper are an important step to make holistic methods more competitive, at least for the min-warping method investigated here. Moreover, for feature-based methods, a number of studies have been dedicated to the comparative evaluation of different feature detectors and descriptors for different applications [1,2,5,[17][18][19] indicating that there may be no single method suitable for all applications. A systematic study exploring the application of feature-based methods for local visual homing with panoramic images is not yet available, and would also be beyond the scope of this paper.…”
Section: Feature-based Vs Holistic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recent approaches with regards to tracking could be found in [33], [34]. In [15], [16], interest point along with texture features have been used for image retrieval.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%