The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02450-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions

Abstract: Purpose Accurate identification of metastatic lesions is important for improvement in biomechanical models that calculate the fracture risk of metastatic bones. The aim of this study was therefore to assess the inter- and intra-operator reliability of manual segmentation of femoral metastatic lesions. Methods CT scans of 54 metastatic femurs (19 osteolytic, 17 osteoblastic, and 18 mixed) were segmented two times by two operators. Dice coefficients (DCs) we… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 23 Also, implementation of the strain-dependent approach requires well-defined lytic lesions to evaluate lesion region strain as mixed/diffuse metastatic lesion geometries/boundaries are harder to identify. 46 However, identifying lesion boundaries is not critical in nonlinear material-based global femur strength outcome simulations, which inherently account for change in material behavior resulting from MBD. Also, nonlinear models have been shown to explain more variance in failure load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 23 Also, implementation of the strain-dependent approach requires well-defined lytic lesions to evaluate lesion region strain as mixed/diffuse metastatic lesion geometries/boundaries are harder to identify. 46 However, identifying lesion boundaries is not critical in nonlinear material-based global femur strength outcome simulations, which inherently account for change in material behavior resulting from MBD. Also, nonlinear models have been shown to explain more variance in failure load.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection of the depth-varying threshold is done based on the thresholds recommended by the automatic “Edge Finder” and “Mean + Standard Deviation” approaches, but the selection of which algorithm to use, and the exact depth-varying threshold, as well as manual removal of branching vessels, all introduce some degree of subjectivity into the segmentation process. The intra- and inter-operator variability in the resulting segmentation is calculated using the 3D dice-coefficient, DC [ 32 ]: where A and B are two different segmentation volumes. The average intra-operator variability was 0.89, and the average inter-operator variability was 0.86.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%