1984
DOI: 10.1094/phyto-74-1086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Induced Mutants of Papaya Ringspot Virus for Control by Cross Protection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
82
0
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
82
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…We successfully obtained two mild isolates Pk-47 and Pk-81 from the severe strain of CGMMV-Pk by subjecting it to low temperature treatment. It has been observed that a certain time interval between the protection and challenge-inoculation is required to establish cross-protection, and the degree of crossprotection is related to the concentration of the protecting virus in the plants [10,11,25]. Our preliminary data also supports this conclusion however; it needs to check the effect of inoculum's concentration (both protecting and challenge isolate) in our case.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We successfully obtained two mild isolates Pk-47 and Pk-81 from the severe strain of CGMMV-Pk by subjecting it to low temperature treatment. It has been observed that a certain time interval between the protection and challenge-inoculation is required to establish cross-protection, and the degree of crossprotection is related to the concentration of the protecting virus in the plants [10,11,25]. Our preliminary data also supports this conclusion however; it needs to check the effect of inoculum's concentration (both protecting and challenge isolate) in our case.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Cross-protection has effectively been used against Papaya ringspot virus (PRSV) [9][10][11], Watermelon mosaic virus (WMV) [12], Cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) [13][14][15], Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) [16][17][18], Citrus tristeza virus (CTV) [19], Zucchini yellow mosaic virus (ZYMV) [20], Cowpea mosaic virus (CPMV) [21] and Tomato mosaic virus (T o MV) [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pathogenderived resistance to CMV and other viruses works either through the triggering of RNA silencing against the transgene-encoded RNA, or through disruption of one or more stages of viral infection by constitutive expression of wild-type or mutant viral proteins by the host plant (Hellwald & Palukaitis, 1995;Beachy, 1997;Wintermanteldescribed as early as the 1920s by McKinney (1929) who showed that tobacco plants that had previously been inoculated with a tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) strain causing mild green mosaic symptoms were resistant to a subsequent challenge with a TMV strain that caused yellow mosaic symptoms. Cross-protection has been deployed commercially against a variety of viruses, including TMV and tomato mosaic virus (Rast, 1967a, b), papaya ringspot virus (Yeh & Gonsalves, 1984) and citrus tristeza virus (Costa & Müller, 1980), as well as CMV (RodriguezAlvarado et al, 2001). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These plants exhibit ''pathogen-derived resistance'' through a process that might be similar to the natural phenomenon of viral cross protection [68][69][70]. The cp of the PRSV is the dominant viral gene and has been the preferred choice of scientists in 11 countries to develop PRSV-resistant papaya through genetic engineering [11].…”
Section: Development Of Economically Important Traits In Papaya By Gementioning
confidence: 99%