2004
DOI: 10.1093/rpd/nch329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of indoor gamma radiation dose in dwellings

Abstract: The use of materials containing naturally occurring radionuclides for house construction may enhance the natural radiation background to which some population groups are exposed. External exposure results from gamma emitter radionuclides existing in the walls, floor and ceiling. Mathematical models can be used to predict external dose rates inside a room, provided the compartment geometry and the radionuclide concentration activities are known. This paper presents a methodology and a computer code for theoreti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
18
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Overviews of the different approaches and direct comparisons of their results are available in Refs. (Markkanen, 1995;Markkanen, 1999;Ahmad et al, 1998;Máduar and Hiromoto, 2004;Allam, 2009;Risica et al, 2001). Generally, the predictions from the different A&B approaches are consistent to the 10e15% level.…”
Section: Comparison To the Attenuation And Buildup Approachmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Overviews of the different approaches and direct comparisons of their results are available in Refs. (Markkanen, 1995;Markkanen, 1999;Ahmad et al, 1998;Máduar and Hiromoto, 2004;Allam, 2009;Risica et al, 2001). Generally, the predictions from the different A&B approaches are consistent to the 10e15% level.…”
Section: Comparison To the Attenuation And Buildup Approachmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…(Koblinger, 1978;Stranden, 1979;Mustonen, 1985a,b) have been developed with slightly different assumptions in Fortran Markkanen, 1995;Markkanen, 1999;Mirza et al, 1991;Ahmad et al, 1998;Máduar and Hiromoto, 2004), Maple (Ademola and Farai, 2005), and Pascal (Allam, 2009). Overviews of the different approaches and direct comparisons of their results are available in Refs.…”
Section: Comparison To the Attenuation And Buildup Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The integration over the volumetric radiation source was performed using the program Mathematica [19], which was applied for all interpolations in this study. Specifi c absorbed dose rates of 238 U, 232 Th and 40 K were determined for the detection point placed at the centre of the room with standard dimensions: 4 × 5 × 2.8 m 3 , without doors and windows [17] and with variable thickness of the walls: from 10 to 25 cm.…”
Section: Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the density and thickness of the materials used for room construction belong to a wide range (and can differ signifi cantly from the standard room values) in this study, for the purpose of the calculation of the conversion factors q, we took into account the effect of these parameters' variability as discussed in [18,19]. Furthermore, the effective dose was evaluated by applying the conversion coeffi cients for room geometry obtained by interpolation of their published values for isotropic (ISO) irradiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such materials were shown to have specific activities of 210 Pb from 390 to 430 Bq kg À1 , of 226 Ra from 300 to 440 Bq kg À1 , and of 238 U from 14 to 37 Bq kg À1 (Al-Jundi et al, 2008). Living in a house built with gypsum containing enhanced levels of natural radionuclides could cause increased radiation doses to the residents (Maduar and Hiromoto, 2004;Turhan et al, 2008). Other building materials with elevated concentrations of radioactivity may be introduced in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%