2019
DOI: 10.5334/aogh.2397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Indian Prediction Models for Lung Function Parameters: A Statistical Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming N features were retaining from the model, we performed a linear regression between the kept N features and HAMD-17 scores for the 1021 MDD patients, which can be formulated as where X is 1021 × N feature matrix, y is 1021 × 1 response vector, and β is N × 1 coefficient vector. By least-squares approximation, we want to minimize solving the objective function, we have …”
Section: Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Assuming N features were retaining from the model, we performed a linear regression between the kept N features and HAMD-17 scores for the 1021 MDD patients, which can be formulated as where X is 1021 × N feature matrix, y is 1021 × 1 response vector, and β is N × 1 coefficient vector. By least-squares approximation, we want to minimize solving the objective function, we have …”
Section: Methods and Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where X is 1021 × N feature matrix, y is 1021 × 1 response vector, and β is N × 1 coefficient vector. By least-squares approximation, 46 we want to minimize The accuracy of the prediction model was evaluated with four frequently used statistics: 47−49 multiple R 2 , adjusted R 2 , MAE, and RMSE.…”
Section: Acs Chemical Neurosciencementioning
confidence: 99%