2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2009.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of impact fatigue damage in glass/epoxy composite laminate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The delamination pattern is dependent upon the stacking sequence of the composite plate. A delamination crack preferentially propagates through a matrix rich area, which is relatively less resistant than that of a fiber pathway [18]. Delamination of the plies is the primary damage mode in a low-velocity impact test, and the delamination energy is directly related to the damage size.…”
Section: Force-time Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The delamination pattern is dependent upon the stacking sequence of the composite plate. A delamination crack preferentially propagates through a matrix rich area, which is relatively less resistant than that of a fiber pathway [18]. Delamination of the plies is the primary damage mode in a low-velocity impact test, and the delamination energy is directly related to the damage size.…”
Section: Force-time Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some engineering materials also have laminated structures and for these materials impact strength is also a matter of concern. Glass fibre composites, for example, have good impact resistance but if the impacts are repeated they gradually weaken and fail as a result of build-up of microscopic damage (Azouaoui et al, 2010;Schrauwen and Peijs, 2002). This type of failure, known as impact fatigue, has not previously been investigated for mollusc shells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shown in Fig. 6a is the fracture surface of E-glass/epoxy cross ply laminate ([0/90/0/90/0/90/0/90/0]) observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) after low velocity impact [30]. Fig.…”
Section: Unidirectional Casementioning
confidence: 99%