2010
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of image-shift measurement algorithms for solar Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors

Abstract: Context. Solar Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensors measure differential wavefront tilts as the relative shift between images from different subapertures. There are several methods in use for measuring these shifts. Aims. We evaluate the inherent accuracy of the methods and the effects of various sources of error, such as noise, bias mismatch, and blurring. We investigate whether Z-tilts or G-tilts are measured. Methods. We test the algorithms on two kinds of artificial data sets, one corresponding to images with … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
40
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We find, however that the Fourier-based algorithm strongly underestimates large shifts values. This agrees with results by Löfdahl (2010). For our purpose -(1) no adaptive optics correction, i.e.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We find, however that the Fourier-based algorithm strongly underestimates large shifts values. This agrees with results by Löfdahl (2010). For our purpose -(1) no adaptive optics correction, i.e.…”
Section: Simulation Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…I = I − I and R = R − R , where denotes averaging over the N c × N c pixels. w 2 is a 2-dimensional Hamming window as recommended by Löfdahl (2010):…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…More recently, Löfdahl (2010) discussed image-shift measurements in the context of solar wavefront sensors, which are also applicable to the LCT implementations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no point-like object for wavefront sensing, which is usually performed with a Shack-Hartmann sensor. Instead, the cross correlation between images observed in individual sub-apertures has to be calculated to estimate the shape of the wavefront (Löfdahl, 2010). Significantly poorer daytime atmospheric conditions place much higher demands on the updating frequency of a deformable mirror.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%