2021
DOI: 10.3390/jcm10214817
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of ILEX SelfCerv for Detection of High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infection in Gynecology Clinic Attendees at a Tertiary Hospital in South Africa

Abstract: Background: The SelfCerv Self-Collection Cervical Health Screening Kit (Ilex Medical Ltd., Johannesburg, South Africa) is an applicator tampon designed for self-collection of vaginal samples for the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and E6/E7 messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA). The study aimed to evaluate the performance of the SelfCerv applicator tampon for the detection of hr-HPV for cervical cancer screening, and further to investigate women’s experiences and preferences reg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This was an analytic cross-sectional study conducted between March 2016 and September 2018, targeting women aged 18 years and older attending gynecology clinics at a tertiary hospital in Pretoria, South Africa. The cross-sectional study has been described in detail previously [ 24 ]. The Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences Research and Ethics Committee approved the study (SMUREC/P/75/2016: IR).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was an analytic cross-sectional study conducted between March 2016 and September 2018, targeting women aged 18 years and older attending gynecology clinics at a tertiary hospital in Pretoria, South Africa. The cross-sectional study has been described in detail previously [ 24 ]. The Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences Research and Ethics Committee approved the study (SMUREC/P/75/2016: IR).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most common exclusion criterion was 'no comparable clinician testing' (n = 29), followed by 'no outcome measure of interest' (n = 3), 'no African setting' (n = 1), 'no full-text' available (n = 1) and 'doubtful quality' (n = 1). Finally, 28 articles were included in the systematic review [20, and 21 in the meta-analysis [36,38,[40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][50][51][52][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] (see Fig. 1).…”
Section: Study Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Study settings were mostly urban (n = 25), whereas three studies were conducted in rural regions [36,48,53]. Recruitment methods comprised 'clinic attendant' [36,38,40,41,43,45,47,49,51,[59][60][61][62] (n = 13), 'outreach' [39,42,46,50,52,54,56,57] (n = 8) and 'community' [20,37,44,48,53,55,58] (n = 7). Seven studies dealt with a population at risk [38,42,45,47,50,57,59] and 21 with a general population [20,36,37,[39][40][41]43,44,46,48,49,[51]...…”
Section: General Study Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations