2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.08.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of hydrogen peroxide gaseous disinfection systems to decontaminate viruses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
77
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…No significant inactivation was observed even after 10 min of contact with these compounds in solution. These results are not surprising for two reasons: first of all, the ability to survive exposure to gastric acidity would be a useful evolutionary development for a foodborne virus (Baert et al 2009a) and second, previous studies have already demonstrated that hydrogen peroxide is an effective virucide only at concentrations higher than 10 g L -1 and therefore is less potent than PAA (Eterpi et al 2009;Li et al 2011;Pottage et al 2010). It is worth noting that despite their weak activity, both the acid and hydrogen peroxide are likely essential for the activity of the peroxyacid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…No significant inactivation was observed even after 10 min of contact with these compounds in solution. These results are not surprising for two reasons: first of all, the ability to survive exposure to gastric acidity would be a useful evolutionary development for a foodborne virus (Baert et al 2009a) and second, previous studies have already demonstrated that hydrogen peroxide is an effective virucide only at concentrations higher than 10 g L -1 and therefore is less potent than PAA (Eterpi et al 2009;Li et al 2011;Pottage et al 2010). It is worth noting that despite their weak activity, both the acid and hydrogen peroxide are likely essential for the activity of the peroxyacid.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…However, inactivation of B. atrophaeus spores required overnight exposure in the presence of soil load. Other laboratory fumigation agents such as VHP, formaldehyde, and gaseous chlorine dioxide (GCD) have varying degrees of soil load tolerance (Casella & Schmidt-Lorenz, 1989;Julie et al, 2011;Koen & Frank, 2011;Meszaros, 2005;Pottage et al, 2010). Among them, GCD appears to tolerate soil load best (Krishnan et al, 2006b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This retention of viability in a small subsection of spores that remain resistant to gaseous disinfectants is a phenomenon known as "trailing" (33). Various explanations for this include: (i) the presence of a subpopulation of hyper-resistant spores, (ii) the occlusion of spores by layering or other factors, and/or (iii) the possibility of cross-contamination.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%