1988
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(88)90318-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of histopathologic parameters in predicting cervical lymph node metastasis of oral and oropharyngeal carcinomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
0
5

Year Published

1995
1995
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
36
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…A highly significant association between the presence of lymphovascular invasion and nodal metastases in elective neck dissections was also shown in studies by Shingaki et al, Pimenta Amaral et al, Brown et al, and Sparano et al 16,17,24,29 Another strong predictor for SLNM in our study was a dissolute growth pattern at the infiltrating tumor front, with PPV of 83.3% and odds ratio of 75. The histologic assessment and classification of the mode of invasion is not easy and warrants effort and experience from the pathologists.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A highly significant association between the presence of lymphovascular invasion and nodal metastases in elective neck dissections was also shown in studies by Shingaki et al, Pimenta Amaral et al, Brown et al, and Sparano et al 16,17,24,29 Another strong predictor for SLNM in our study was a dissolute growth pattern at the infiltrating tumor front, with PPV of 83.3% and odds ratio of 75. The histologic assessment and classification of the mode of invasion is not easy and warrants effort and experience from the pathologists.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…15,23,27,35,43 However, others were able to do so. 16,17,21,22,29,33,42 For the parameter muscle invasion there is only the report by Pimenta Amaral et al showing an association with nodal metastases. 17 The reports for the parameter lymphoplasmacytic infiltration are again controversial in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Alguns fatores são importantes para definir o prognóstico dos CEC, como a gradação histológica das lesões (31)(32)(33), o tamanho da lesão (34,35) e até mesmo a consistência tumoral (35). No entanto, o estadiamento de linfadenopatia cervical é o principal fator para determinação do prognóstico destes pacientes (32, 36) e a falha no exame clínico em detectar metástases em linfonodos pode chegar a 40% (37,38).…”
Section: Fatores Prognósticosunclassified