Evaluation of HEPA vacuum cleaning and dry steam cleaning in reducing levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and house dust mite allergens in carpets
Abstract:Dry steam cleaning, which has gained recent attention as an effective method to reduce house dust mite (HDM) allergen concentration and loading in carpets, was evaluated in this study for its efficacy in lowering levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) as well as HDM allergens. Fifty urban homes with wail-to-wall carpets, mostly low-income and with known lead contamination, were studied in 2003 and 2004. Two carpet-cleaning interventions were compared: Repeated HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air f… Show more
“…Studies examining the effect of vacuuming in reducing dust mite concentrations have yielded mixed results; however, the consensus is that vacuuming does decrease the bulk of dust mite allergen in carpet [13,14]. The effi ciency of dust mite allergen extraction from carpets by vacuuming is largely infl uenced by pile height and the overall condition of the carpet.…”
Section: Exposure Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, some evidence suggests that dry steam cleaning, when added to an intensive vacuuming regimen, provides some added reduction in dust mite allergen compared with vacuuming alone. In 2009, Yu et al [14] found that an additional 5% reduction in dust mite allergen was achieved when dry steam cleaning was added to a regular vacuuming regimen. A similar study reported that lower levels of dust mite allergen were sustained for a greater duration when a dry steam cleaning treatment was added to a rigorous vacuuming schedule [16].…”
Children spend a considerable portion of their time indoors. Therefore, homes and schools are an important source of allergen exposure. Chronic exposure to the major indoor allergens can lead to allergic sensitization and provoke allergic symptoms in children. Environmental assessment is crucial for the identification and quantification of such allergens in indoor spaces. Reduction of allergen exposure below sensitization and symptom thresholds is possible with various remediation techniques. This article reviews and discusses evidence for the assessment and remediation of indoor allergens commonly found in homes and schools. A literature review was performed using the PubMed database for English-language articles published between January 1, 1980, and February 2009. Additional information was obtained from a review of recent textbooks and one professional society's webpage.
“…Studies examining the effect of vacuuming in reducing dust mite concentrations have yielded mixed results; however, the consensus is that vacuuming does decrease the bulk of dust mite allergen in carpet [13,14]. The effi ciency of dust mite allergen extraction from carpets by vacuuming is largely infl uenced by pile height and the overall condition of the carpet.…”
Section: Exposure Mitigationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, some evidence suggests that dry steam cleaning, when added to an intensive vacuuming regimen, provides some added reduction in dust mite allergen compared with vacuuming alone. In 2009, Yu et al [14] found that an additional 5% reduction in dust mite allergen was achieved when dry steam cleaning was added to a regular vacuuming regimen. A similar study reported that lower levels of dust mite allergen were sustained for a greater duration when a dry steam cleaning treatment was added to a rigorous vacuuming schedule [16].…”
Children spend a considerable portion of their time indoors. Therefore, homes and schools are an important source of allergen exposure. Chronic exposure to the major indoor allergens can lead to allergic sensitization and provoke allergic symptoms in children. Environmental assessment is crucial for the identification and quantification of such allergens in indoor spaces. Reduction of allergen exposure below sensitization and symptom thresholds is possible with various remediation techniques. This article reviews and discusses evidence for the assessment and remediation of indoor allergens commonly found in homes and schools. A literature review was performed using the PubMed database for English-language articles published between January 1, 1980, and February 2009. Additional information was obtained from a review of recent textbooks and one professional society's webpage.
“…Statistics after cleaning (mg/cm 2 ) were a minimum of 0.0019, a maximum of 0.289, a median of 0.0102, an arithmetic mean of 0.0463, an arithmetic standard deviation of 0.0863, a geometric mean of 0.0146 (mean, standard deviation, and geometric mean were calculated from the raw data provided by Roberts et al 1999). Yu et al (2009) collected 50 dust samples from carpets in New Jersey homes before and after cleaning. The houses were identified as mostly low-income, urban residences.…”
Section: Dust Surface Loading (Dsl): Hard Surfacesmentioning
Soil ingestion rates calculated using a tracer-based mass balance approach may carry considerable study errors, insensitivities, and "artefacts" of analysis that result in significant uncertainty. These same soil ingestion rates are often used as surrogates for dust ingestion rates. Therefore, a more direct and mechanistic method was developed to estimate soil and dust ingestion rates. The soil and dust ingestion rates were calculated using measures of: particle loading to indoor surfaces; fraction transferred to the hands; hand surface area; fraction of hand surface area that may be mouthed or contact food; frequency of hand-to-mouth events, amount dissolved by saliva; and exposure time. Adapted specifically for the Canadian context, estimated mean indoor dust ingestion rates range from 2.2 mg/d for teenagers to 41 mg/d for toddlers; mean soil ingestion rates range from 1.2 mg/d for seniors to 23 mg/d for children. Combined soil and dust ingestion rates ranged from 3.8 mg/d for seniors to 61 mg/d for toddlers. These ingestion rates are lower than values adopted by most agencies. These ingestion rates are mechanistic, can be adjusted on a site-specific basis, can be modified into an hourly rate and are presented as a more realistic alternative to traditional mass balance approaches.
“…(69) A steam vapor machine differs from the commonly known "steam cleaner" which is a hot-water carpet shampooing machine. Steam was demonstrated to be effective in reducing dust mite populations.…”
Section: Figure 2 Percent Biocontaminants Reduction By Treatment Typementioning
Carpet is known to be a reservoir for biological contaminants, such as dust mites, dust mite allergen, and mold, if it is not kept clean. The accumulation of these contaminants in carpet might trigger allergies or asthma symptoms in both children and adults. The purpose of this study is to compare methods for removal of dust mites, dust mite allergens, and mold from carpet. Carpets were artificially worn to simulate 1 to 2 years of wear in a four-person household. The worn carpets were inoculated together with a common indoor mold (Cladosporium species) and house dust mites and incubated for 6 weeks to allow time for dust mite growth on the carpet. The carpets were randomly assigned to one of the four treatment groups. Available treatment regimens for controlling carpet contaminants were evaluated through a literature review and experimentation. Four moderately low-hazard, nondestructive methods were selected as treatments: vacuuming, steam-vapor, Neem oil (a natural tree extract), and benzalkonium chloride (a quaternary ammonium compound). Steam vapor treatment demonstrated the greatest dust mite population reduction (p < 0.05) when compared to other methods. The two physical methods, steam vapor and vacuuming, have no statistically significant efficacy in inactivating dust mite allergens (p = 0.084), but have higher efficacy when compared to the chemical method on dust mite allergens (p = 0.002). There is no statistically significant difference in the efficacy for reducing mold in carpet (p > 0.05) for both physical and chemical methods. The steam-vapor treatment effectively killed dust mites and denatured dust mite allergen in the laboratory environment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.