2019
DOI: 10.1093/cdn/nzz034.or07-07-19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Hemoglobin Cutoffs for Defining Anemia in a Multinational Sample of Healthy Individuals: The BRINDA Project (OR07-07-19)

Abstract: Objectives Current WHO hemoglobin (Hb) cutoffs (< 110 g/L, 6–59mo; < 120 g/L, 15–49y non-pregnant women) to define anemia were established in 1967 and validated in 1980 s among iron replete USA survey participants. Our objective was to examine the consistency of Hb cutoffs from multiple countries and age-variations in Hb concentrations among apparently healthy people using contemporary data. Methods We analyzed altitude… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Subclinical malaria, though not formally examined by a peripheral smear examination, was effectively excluded through negative inflammatory biomarkers, and negligible (0·26%) history of malaria in the 2 weeks preceding the survey. We chose the 5th percentile cutoffs to define anaemia for comparability with published literature; 9 these cutoffs are marginally higher than the suggested 2·5th percentile. 4 The 5th percentile is also a more conservative cutoff; if the 2·5th percentile was chosen as the cutoff, the anaemia prevalence would also be lower than our estimates and further from prevalence estimates based on the WHO cutoff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subclinical malaria, though not formally examined by a peripheral smear examination, was effectively excluded through negative inflammatory biomarkers, and negligible (0·26%) history of malaria in the 2 weeks preceding the survey. We chose the 5th percentile cutoffs to define anaemia for comparability with published literature; 9 these cutoffs are marginally higher than the suggested 2·5th percentile. 4 The 5th percentile is also a more conservative cutoff; if the 2·5th percentile was chosen as the cutoff, the anaemia prevalence would also be lower than our estimates and further from prevalence estimates based on the WHO cutoff.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2019 conference abstract reported summary haemoglobin data from 25 countries for preschool children (aged 6—59 months, 24 surveys, n=35 088) and women of reproductive age from the Biomarkers Reflecting Inflammation and Nutritional Determinants of Anaemia (BRINDA) project. 9 Their definition of healthy was based on the exclusion of iron and vitamin A deficiency, inflammation detected through biomarkers, and malaria. In this study, we aimed to assess the age-specific and sex-specific percentiles of haemoglobin and cutoffs to diagnose anaemia in children and adolescents aged 1–19 years, including additional rigorous criteria to define a healthy population, using the 2019 quality controlled, nationally representative Comprehensive National Nutrition Survey (CNNS) in India.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the lack of updating and proper validation of this threshold, it is still used globally to identify VAD in PSC through SR and sometimes RBP concentrations (when it’s used as a proxy), in national and sub-national MNS. This challenge is present with most thresholds of nutrition biomarkers [ 56 , 58 ], especially those where proper development and validation procedures were not followed. After close to 60 years, the cut-off value for SR needs to be reviewed through properly designed studies and updated methods, to determine its accuracy and relevance for different countries and age groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Furthermore, there are reports of high heterogeneity regarding the hemoglobin levels that should define anemia among different countries, particularly in tropical regions. 124 126 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Furthermore, there are reports of high heterogeneity regarding the hemoglobin levels that should define anemia among different countries, particularly in tropical regions. [124][125][126] Health determinants of anemia. The prevalence and distribution of anemia (particularly IDA) is considered to have (1) fundamental, (2) underlying, (3) intermediate, and (4) immediate determinants, involving a complex interplay of factors.…”
Section: Main Strategies To Reduce Anemiamentioning
confidence: 99%