2020
DOI: 10.1002/jcph.1595
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Hemodialysis Effect on Pharmacokinetics of Meropenem/Vaborbactam in End‐Stage Renal Disease Patients Using Modeling and Simulation

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to evaluate the effect of hemodialysis (HD) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of meropenem/vaborbactam, an approved beta‐lactam/beta‐lactamase inhibitor combination, and provide the rationale for the recommended timing of meropenem/vaborbactam administration relative to HD in end‐stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. Population PK models were developed separately for meropenem and vaborbactam in subjects with normal renal function and different degrees of renal impairment, including… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is worth noting that the pharmacokinetics of BLIs in patients with severely compromised renal function may be altered by the presence of hemodialysis (HD) that can remove nearly half a dose of AVI and VAB [79,[84][85][86]. In particular, the mean increase in systemic CL of VAB was 5.11-fold during HD [79], while median predicted values of HD CL for VAB and MER did not significantly differ (7.9 and 5.68 L/h, respectively) [87]. ESRD patients receiving DUR showed similar findings [81].…”
Section: Excretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worth noting that the pharmacokinetics of BLIs in patients with severely compromised renal function may be altered by the presence of hemodialysis (HD) that can remove nearly half a dose of AVI and VAB [79,[84][85][86]. In particular, the mean increase in systemic CL of VAB was 5.11-fold during HD [79], while median predicted values of HD CL for VAB and MER did not significantly differ (7.9 and 5.68 L/h, respectively) [87]. ESRD patients receiving DUR showed similar findings [81].…”
Section: Excretionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PK/PD targets for ceftazidime, ceftolozane and meropenem were 50% f T > MIC, 40% f T > MIC, and 45% f T > MIC, respectively [ 13 , 32 , 33 ]. The PK/PD targets of the three antibacterial agents should be increased to 70% f T > MIC and 100% f T > MIC in critically ill patients [ 34 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PK/PD target of vaborbactam was f AUC 24 /MIC > 9 [ 35 ]. The free drug fractions used in these simulations were 85%, 92%, 98%, and 67% for ceftazidime, avibactam, meropenem, and vaborbactam, respectively [ 33 , 36 ]. Notably, the original PK parameter of ceftolozane and tazobactam were obtained from unbound concentrations, and their PK data were used directly for analysis in this study [ 28 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CrCl ≥90 mL/min: 1.25 g q 6 h CrCl 60-89 mL/min: 1 g q 6 h CrCl 30-59 mL/min: 0.75 g q 6 h CrCl 15-29 mL/min: 0.5 g q 6 h CrCl <15 mL/min: 0.5 g q 6 h yes [32,45,46] meropenem/ vaborbactam cUTI: 4 g q 8 h (5-14 days) CrCl ≥50 mL/min: 4 g q 8 h CrCl 30-49 mL/min: 2 g q 8 h CrCl 15-29 mL/min: 2 g q 12 h CrCl <15 mL/min: 1 g q 12 h yes [37,[47][48][49][50] meropenem/nacubactam Not available…”
Section: Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%