2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Heliostat Field Global Tracking Error Distributions by Monte Carlo Simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be particularly accentuated for large incidence angles, that is, very inclined heliostats (large ) or nonflat receivers. However, as has been discussed elsewhere [9], for north field configurations with flat receivers, the distance between these points is relatively small in comparison with the displacements caused by drift. For other kinds of configurations the model should be further developed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This may be particularly accentuated for large incidence angles, that is, very inclined heliostats (large ) or nonflat receivers. However, as has been discussed elsewhere [9], for north field configurations with flat receivers, the distance between these points is relatively small in comparison with the displacements caused by drift. For other kinds of configurations the model should be further developed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…Heliostat control requires adjusting the angles of the tracking mechanism according to calculations in such a way that the heliostat normal vector bisects the angle between solar vector and relative target position vector [7]. However, this task is subject to many errors [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. Drift is defined as the wandering of the concentrated light spot produced by a heliostat.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In [5], Jones and Stone shows the calculated positions of the heliostat beam on the target at 1-hour increments, implementing fixed values for three main types of geometric error sources: encoder reference offset, mirror alignment and heliostat tilt. In [6], Díaz-Felix et al simulated tracking errors by adding an angular deviation angle to the vector normal to the heliostat, in azimuth or elevation, relative to its ideal orientation. Numerical results are also shown, illustrating daily drift trajectories for a fixed value of the deviation angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%