2013
DOI: 10.3163/1536-5050.101.2.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of health information outreach: theory, practice, and future direction

Abstract: Planning outcome evaluation carefully and conducting research into mediators between health information and behavior will strengthen the ability to identify best practices and develop a theoretical framework and practical guidance for health information outreach.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 One area of potential improvement for libraries providing health literacy programs is the measurement of the impact of library efforts. Assessment, including the identification and measurement of outcomes, is often an afterthought of library programs, and previous reviews of library outreach efforts have highlighted weaknesses in the quality of measurement, analysis, and design (Whitney, 2013). The most common form of evaluation for health literacy programs in libraries remains the pre-and post-test survey that uses self-report to gauge impact and effectiveness (Aspinall et al, 2012;Kouame & Young, 2014;Strong et al, 2012;.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 One area of potential improvement for libraries providing health literacy programs is the measurement of the impact of library efforts. Assessment, including the identification and measurement of outcomes, is often an afterthought of library programs, and previous reviews of library outreach efforts have highlighted weaknesses in the quality of measurement, analysis, and design (Whitney, 2013). The most common form of evaluation for health literacy programs in libraries remains the pre-and post-test survey that uses self-report to gauge impact and effectiveness (Aspinall et al, 2012;Kouame & Young, 2014;Strong et al, 2012;.…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to research, librarians are well-positioned to conduct investigations into how patrons and members of the public select and evaluate health information re-sources and integrate information from multiple sources. They can also contribute to bridging research and practice by conducting systematic evaluations of their health information outreach projects and determining what factors enable or hinder their success [72]. Finally, when it comes to research, librarians can apply their expertise in comprehensive literature searches to conducting meta-analyses of the literature on the connection between health information literacy and behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the reason for your outreach may have been to affect behaviors and decisions related to health by providing trusted health information resources, it is often difficult to measure such impact. Instead, other factors may be measured to determine whether the desired results were obtained (Whitney, Dutcher, and Keselman 2013).…”
Section: Outreach Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%