2019
DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2019.1621023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of hazard distances related to toxic releases in a gas refinery: comparison of chemical exposure index and consequence modeling approaches

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite existing mandatory safety rules and a wide range of methods for hazard identification and evaluation, industrial accidents still occur. [1][2][3] The lessons learned from past accidents have led to various types of protection layers to prevent accidents and/or mitigate their consequences. 4 Safety Instrumented Functions (SIFs) operated by Safety Instrumented Systems (SISs), such as high-level trip and high-pressure trip, are widely used in process industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite existing mandatory safety rules and a wide range of methods for hazard identification and evaluation, industrial accidents still occur. [1][2][3] The lessons learned from past accidents have led to various types of protection layers to prevent accidents and/or mitigate their consequences. 4 Safety Instrumented Functions (SIFs) operated by Safety Instrumented Systems (SISs), such as high-level trip and high-pressure trip, are widely used in process industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intensity of the consequence analysis studies on the release of H 2 S is remarkable. Chemical Exposure Index (CEI) and consequences modeling software (PHAST‐Process Hazard Analysis Software Tool) were used by Cheraghi et al 1 to determine the effect distance of toxic chemical release in a gas refinery. According to both CEI and consequence modeling, the most dangerous unit was defined as sludge catching unit 1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical Exposure Index (CEI) and consequences modeling software (PHAST‐Process Hazard Analysis Software Tool) were used by Cheraghi et al 1 to determine the effect distance of toxic chemical release in a gas refinery. According to both CEI and consequence modeling, the most dangerous unit was defined as sludge catching unit 1 . Flammable and toxic vapor emissions and simulation of cloud distribution were performed with PHAST in the 4th Gas Facility in South Pars of Iran case in 2012 by Falsafi et al 2 A simple methodology was developed by evaluating the meteorological data extracted from Pasquill's stability table, and the terrain height difference between the emission source and gas detectors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They revealed that the simulations obtained from ALOHA could be the basis for impact analysis and risk assessment studies. Cheraghi et al [18] used the CEI method to determine hazard distances caused by toxic release in a gas refinery as a case study. Consequence analysis was carried out with the PHAST software for the scenario with the highest airborne quantity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%