2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2011.08.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Harm in the Pharmacotherapy of Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
82
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
82
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The safety of rifaximin was favorable and generally comparable with that of placebo; no Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea was reported in the TARGET 1 and 2 studies. Regarding its safety profile, meta-analyses of rifaximin trials showed no difference in the overall incidence of AEs compared with placebo [Ford et al 2014a;Menees et al 2012;Shah et al 2012]. Furthermore, data indicated that 846 patients would benefit from rifaximin treatment for every 1 patient harmed (number needed to harm 8971; NNT 10.6) [Shah et al 2012].…”
Section: Targeting Gut Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The safety of rifaximin was favorable and generally comparable with that of placebo; no Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea was reported in the TARGET 1 and 2 studies. Regarding its safety profile, meta-analyses of rifaximin trials showed no difference in the overall incidence of AEs compared with placebo [Ford et al 2014a;Menees et al 2012;Shah et al 2012]. Furthermore, data indicated that 846 patients would benefit from rifaximin treatment for every 1 patient harmed (number needed to harm 8971; NNT 10.6) [Shah et al 2012].…”
Section: Targeting Gut Microbiotamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This measure also accounts for differing culture and values in that the patient must weight benefit and risk. We conducted a meta-analysis 56 evaluating IBS therapies which received at least a Grade 1b from the ACG Task Force for IBS primary endpoints 43 for dropouts due to adverse events. For diarrhea-predominant IBS (IBS-D), antidepressant and alosetron therapy led to one dropout due to adverse events for only every 2.3 and 2.6 patients benefiting from therapy, respectively.…”
Section: Concerns With Existing Binary Patient-based Endpointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the pooled analysis, the most common AEs with rifaximin 550 mg (n = 1008) vs. placebo (n = 829) were headache (5.5 vs. 6.2%), upper respiratory tract infection (4.5 vs. 5.7%), nausea (4.1 vs. 3.7%), and abdominal pain (4.0 vs. 4.7%) [110]. A meta-analysis determined that one individual with IBS-D would have an AE with rifaximin for every 846 individuals who would benefit (number needed to harm = 8,971; number needed to treat = 10.6) [111]. Because rifaximin is administered as short-course therapy (i.e.…”
Section: Antibioticsmentioning
confidence: 99%