2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.08.055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of growth based rapid microbiological methods for sterility testing of vaccines and other biological products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
34
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
3
34
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Eur./ USP compliant method (Hocquet et al 2014;Parveen et al 2011;Khuu et al 2004Khuu et al , 2006. The results of these validations supported the general use of automated culture systems for sterility testing of celltherapy products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Eur./ USP compliant method (Hocquet et al 2014;Parveen et al 2011;Khuu et al 2004Khuu et al , 2006. The results of these validations supported the general use of automated culture systems for sterility testing of celltherapy products.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The sinus sections were placed into separate aerobic, anaerobic, and fungal broths, and incubated at 37°C for 1 week (29). Sabouraud dextrose broth (Teknova, Hollister, California) was used for fungal identification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A sterility test may be defined as a critical; the traditional method described in EP [15,41] for the sterility test takes 14 days, although other rapid methods have been published and supported in the last annex II of the GMP [42], which entail 7 days [43], the ''shelf-lives'' of cells do not exceed 48 h. Therefore, the final cell medicine must be released parametrically [44], being necessary to provide all additional quality controls described in QCP to ensure that the medicine is free of contaminating microorganisms at the time of release [45]. Through sterility tests prior to release, in the intermediate phases (MCB and WCB) and on the starting material and reagents, besides endotoxin and mycoplasma assays, Gram stain and management of the monitorization process in the final cellular medicine, the absence of viable and active microorganisms can be ensured [6].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%