“…This order differs from the Pauling/Datta scale, where χ (C(CH 3 ) 3 ) is larger than χ (i-C 3 H 7 ) and χ (C 2 H 5 ) due to a spurious steric effect. 11 For other ligands, the broad features generally match those of other methods (e.g., χ (CH 3 ) < χ(CF 3 ), and χ (SiH 3 )<χ (SiCl 3 ) < χ(SiF 3 ), as expected). However, there are a few exceptions, namely C(CH 3 ) 3 , SiH 3 , H, CH 3 , and CF 3 , for which the current approach has the electronegativities increasing in the following order: χ (SiH 3 ) (1.70) < χ(C(CH 3 ) 3 (2.25) < χ(CH 3 ) exp (2.39) < χ(H) exp (2.62) < χ(CF 3 ) exp (3.02), differing somewhat from other approaches such as XPS, Pauling/Datta, and Pearson.…”