1998
DOI: 10.2172/656462
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of groundwater flow and transport at the Shoal underground nuclear test: An interim report

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
67
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
67
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The numerical flow and transport model previously developed for the Shoal site (Pohll et al, 1998) was used to identify the nine uncertain parameters considered in the analysis. These parameters were presented in the CAIP and are as follows: effective porosity, hydraulic head at the downgradient boundary, recharge, hydraulic conductivity, fracture connectivities, fracture orientations, fracture dip, glass dissolution rate, and retardation.…”
Section: Rationale For Proposed Activities: Results Of the Data Decismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical flow and transport model previously developed for the Shoal site (Pohll et al, 1998) was used to identify the nine uncertain parameters considered in the analysis. These parameters were presented in the CAIP and are as follows: effective porosity, hydraulic head at the downgradient boundary, recharge, hydraulic conductivity, fracture connectivities, fracture orientations, fracture dip, glass dissolution rate, and retardation.…”
Section: Rationale For Proposed Activities: Results Of the Data Decismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These studies provide primarily qualitative insight into the affinity of radionuclides for carbonate material; they do not represent specific NTS material or water chemistry. Pohll et al (1998) report sorption studies on granite in support of the Project Shoal investigation.…”
Section: Measured K D Valuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 9.0 Table 9-11 Note: Ca, Sr estimated to have no sorption on granite; Am, Eu, Sm, Pu, Np estimated to be strongly sorbing, analogous to Pb (Pohll, 1998) a K d ranges assigned based on similarity to TCA unit for which estimates based upon stratigraphy were reported by Zavarin et al (2002) b K d ranges assigned based on similarity to CHCU unit for which estimates based upon stratigraphy were reported by Zavarin et al (2002) c K d ranges assigned based on similarity to BA unit for which estimates based upon stratigraphy were reported by Zavarin et al (2002) Note -For Pu, oxygen fugacities of 1E-5, 1E-10, and 1E-15 are considered as they affect the speciation and valence of Pu. …”
Section: Contaminant Transport Parameters For Caus 101 and 102mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given this, radionuclides are not expected to exit the cavity and begin transport through the aquifer until after infilling is completed. At some underground nuclear test sites, the infill process has required decades, and this time has been accounted for in radioactive decay of the source (Pohll et al, 1998;Pohlmann et al, 1999). Estimated cavity infill times for Amchitka are relatively short by comparison, predicted to be 500 days for Milrow based on subsurface hydrologic data (USGS, 1970), and 290 days for Cannikin, based on the time of infilling of Cannikin Lake within the collapse sink (Gonzalez, 1977).…”
Section: Release Ratementioning
confidence: 99%