2021
DOI: 10.1002/qj.4041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of global reanalysis winds and high‐resolution regional model outputs with the 205 MHz stratosphere–troposphere wind profiler radar observations

Abstract: A stratosphere–troposphere (ST) wind profiler radar operating at a high VHF range (205 MHz) installed at Cochin (10.03°N, 76.33°E), India, provides high‐resolution winds in time and altitude extending from 315 m to 20 km. We evaluated the horizontal and vertical winds obtained from atmospheric global reanalyses (ERA5, ERA‐Interim, MERRA‐2 and NCEP) data and the high‐resolution regional model (WRF) output winds with the ST radar (STR) wind observations at Cochin. The data for one whole year, from 1 August 2018 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The consistency of the meridional wind between the IAP-HAGCM simulations and MST radar observations is not as good as it is for the zonal wind. This phenomenon has also been reported in previous studies, such as in a comparison of high-resolution regional model (WRF) wind outputs at Cochin from 315 m to 20 km with ST radar observations [65].…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The consistency of the meridional wind between the IAP-HAGCM simulations and MST radar observations is not as good as it is for the zonal wind. This phenomenon has also been reported in previous studies, such as in a comparison of high-resolution regional model (WRF) wind outputs at Cochin from 315 m to 20 km with ST radar observations [65].…”
supporting
confidence: 86%
“…Since the radiosonde data is assimilated into ERA5, the significantly lower difference between these two datasets (figure 4c) is to be expected. Once again, good agreement between all three datasets is seen, with median differences of -0.44 ms −1 and 0.15 ms −1 between Aeolus, and the Singapore Radiosonde In all three comparisons, there is greater spread between the datasets at higher altitudes, which corresponds with Aeolus' reducing SNR with height and the well known issue of less representative reanalysis winds in the stratosphere compared with the troposphere (Baldwin and Gray, 2005;Kawatani et al, 2016;Sivan et al, 2021). The reason for the lower Aeolus SNR above the tropopause is simply the reduced Rayleigh backscattering caused by atmospheric density dropping exponentially with altitude (Reitebuch et al, 2020), and is a feature seen in pre-launch simulations of Aeolus winds (Rennie, 2018).…”
Section: Validation Against Reanalysis and Radiosondesmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In all three comparisons, there is greater spread between the data sets at higher altitudes, which corresponds with Aeolus' reducing SNR with height and the well-known issue of less representative reanalysis winds in the stratosphere compared with the troposphere (Baldwin and Gray, 2005;Kawatani et al, 2016;Sivan et al, 2021). The reason for the lower Aeolus SNR above the tropopause is simply the reduced Rayleigh backscattering caused by atmospheric density dropping exponentially with altitude , and this is a feature seen in pre-launch simulations of Aeolus winds (Rennie, 2018).…”
Section: Validation Against Reanalysis and Radiosondesmentioning
confidence: 85%