Evaluation of geoheritage models – analysis and its application on the loess profiles in Vojvodina region

Višnić, Tamara; Began, Milica

doi:10.5775/fg.2016.066.i

Cited by 3 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…With the increasing role of information technology in the modern life a crucial significance is paid at promotion of the tourist potential in Internet including design of the interactive tourist maps (Hurčíková & Molčíková, 2014.). An effective promotion of the geoheritage makes a process of choosing the destination by tourists more simple (Tamara & Milica, 2016). A content quality about geoheritage along the cross-border geological routes creates conditions to choose these routes (or several geosites) by tourists according to their needs, opportunities and desires.…”

Section: Discussion On Geological Tourism Development In the Finnish-...mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The part of geotourism development studies is devoted to opportunities of promotion of a unique geological, geomorphological and mining potential as tourist attraction (Vukojević, 2011;Goki et al, 2011;Madziarz, 2013;Rozycki & Dryglas, 2016). Special attention deserve researches that assess the tourist value of the geological and geomorphological sites (Pralong, 2005;Štrba & Rybár, 2015;Tamara & Milica, 2016). The practical result of this evaluation is the base for promotion and including sites in the tourist sphere of the regional economy (Albă.…”

Section: Geological Tourism Development In the Borderlandmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Geological Tourism Development In The Finnish-Russian Borderland: The Case Of The Cross-Border Geological Route “Mining Road”

Nenonen

Степанова

2018

Acta Geoturistica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Finnish-Russian borderland has a unique geological potential for geological tourism development. Creating new tourist attractions based on geoheritage, design and development of the cross-border tourist routes open new opportunities for tourism development on both sides of the border. The article presents the crossborder geological tourist route “Mining Road” as a tool of activation of tourist activity in the Finnish-Russian borderland. This article explores the practical aspects of the project "Mining Road" development for tourism industry. It is proven the significance of cross-border route "Mining road" for preservation, popularization and reproduction of the natural, cultural and historical potential of the borderland.

show abstract

Section: Discussion On Geological Tourism Development In the Finnish-...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Geological Tourism Development In the Borderlandmentioning

confidence: 99%

Geological Tourism Development In The Finnish-Russian Borderland: The Case Of The Cross-Border Geological Route “Mining Road”

Nenonen

Степанова

2018

Acta Geoturistica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For the law to fall into place, responsible agents must create a strategy with a clear target, objectives, and set of choices. This has been widely researched [112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119][120][121] but not yet established for geoheritage. The reason behind, it is the lack of convention on the full range of applicable values.…”

Section: How Conservation Strategies and Urban Planning Look Like Todaymentioning

confidence: 99%

Visitation Rate Analysis of Geoheritage Features from Earth Science Education Perspective Using Automated Landform Classification and Crowdsourcing: A Geoeducation Capacity Map of the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand

Németh

Procter

2021

Geosciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The increase in geoheritage studies has secured recognition globally regarding the importance of abiotic natural features. Prominent in geoheritage screening practices follows a multicriteria assessment framework; however, the complexity of interest in values often causes decision making to overlook geoeducation, one of the primary facets of geosystem services. Auckland volcanic field in New Zealand stretches through the whole area of metropolitan Auckland, which helps preserve volcanic cones and their cultural heritage around its central business district (CBD). They are important sites for developing tourist activities. Geoeducation is becoming a significant factor for tourists and others visiting geomorphological features, but it cannot be achieved without sound planning. This paper investigates the use of big data (FlickR), Geopreservation Inventory, and Geographic Information System for identifying geoeducation capacity of tourist attractions. Through landform classification using the Topographic Position Index and integrated with geological and the inventory data, the underpromoted important geoeducation sites can be mapped and added to the spatial database Auckland Council uses for urban planning. The use of the Geoeducation Capacity Map can help resolve conflicts between the multiple objectives that a bicultural, metropolitan city council need to tackle in the planning of upgrading open spaces while battling of growing demand for land.

show abstract

The evaluation of geoheritage for geotourism development: Case study on the potential Geopark Djerdap

Belij¹,

Đurđić²,

Stojković³

2018

Zb PMF Geog inst Beograd

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Geotourism is a relatively new form of tourism with considerable European and global growth potential. Interest in geotourism is developing at a very rapid rate around the world. It is of great importance to support and enhance the global movement about geotourism generally and specifically into geoparks. Geoparks are different to other forms of protected areas, such as national parks, nature reserves etc. In this paper focus of the research is on quantitative assessments of the exceptional values of geoheritage for the science, education and tourism potential use in the area of the potential Geopark Djerdap. Five selected geosites are relevant to evaluate key values for science, education, and tourism with additional consideration given to degradation risk. All the post-assessment findings aim to improve the focus on the ultimate goal of the study, i.e. to justify the synergy between the protection of natural values (geoconservation) and the corresponding activities in the process of managing the development of geotourism in the study area.

show abstract

Evaluation of geoheritage models – analysis and its application on the loess profiles in Vojvodina region

Cited by 3 publications

References 0 publications

Geological Tourism Development In The Finnish-Russian Borderland: The Case Of The Cross-Border Geological Route “Mining Road”

Geological Tourism Development In The Finnish-Russian Borderland: The Case Of The Cross-Border Geological Route “Mining Road”

Visitation Rate Analysis of Geoheritage Features from Earth Science Education Perspective Using Automated Landform Classification and Crowdsourcing: A Geoeducation Capacity Map of the Auckland Volcanic Field, New Zealand

The evaluation of geoheritage for geotourism development: Case study on the potential Geopark Djerdap

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About