2015
DOI: 10.5958/2229-4473.2015.00043.9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Genetic Variability, Genetic advance, Heritability and Character association for Yield and its Contributing traits in Papaya(Carica papayaL.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
9
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This might be due to the genetical characters. These results are in accordance with the findings of Chalak et al, (2016), Kumar et al, (2015), Meena et al, (2012) and Jana et al, (2010). Anh et al, (2011) recorded that measurements showed that the depth of flesh (DepF) of the hermaphrodite plants was deeper than that of the pistillate plants.…”
Section: Yieldsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be due to the genetical characters. These results are in accordance with the findings of Chalak et al, (2016), Kumar et al, (2015), Meena et al, (2012) and Jana et al, (2010). Anh et al, (2011) recorded that measurements showed that the depth of flesh (DepF) of the hermaphrodite plants was deeper than that of the pistillate plants.…”
Section: Yieldsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, yield performance of any variety is considered as a cumulative effect of yield attributes and the hybrid Surya could not come upto fruit bearing stage due to unfavourable climatic conditions of north Gujarat. Fruit yield plant -1 had significant positive both association with plant height at flowering, petiole length, number of leaves at flowering, fruit length, fruit girth, central cavity, pulp thickness, TSS and number of fruits plant -1 both at genotypic and phenotypic level respectively Kumar et al, (2015).…”
Section: Yieldmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The lowest GV and PV were recorded for the average fruit weight as 0.09 and 0.1, respectively, followed by fruit diameter with 0.4 and 0.47, respectively. These findings are in harmony to [12,16].…”
Section: Genetic Variabilitysupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This might be due to the genetical characters. These results were in accordance with Chalak et al, (2016), Kumar et al, (2015), Meena et al, (2012) and Jana et al, (2010). Chalak et al, (2016), and Prakash et al, (2015).…”
Section: At 180supporting
confidence: 90%