Evaluation of Generic Structure of Research Letters Body Section: Create a Research Letter Body Section Model

Generic Overlap Between Publication Genres: The Case of Biology Research Articles’ and Research Letters’ Introductions in the Journal Nature

“…After that, they need to write a, then Results sentences, before ending with one Conclusion sentence. This confirms the findings of Melliti (2017) that RLs abstracts are composed of three main phases Needless to mention that the suggested number of sentences is identified through resorting to the data collected, but the order of these sentences is based on the researcher knowledge of the genre as well as the logical layout of research papers in general.…”

“…Suggesting what he called Create A Research Letter Introduction Model (CARL Introduction Model), he found that RLs' abstracts are composed 12 sentences of which 7 are obligatory and 5 are optional. The model has also been used by Melliti (2017) to identify what he called Create A Research Letter Body Model (CARL Body Model). He found that the body section of RLs is composed of 58 sentences where 49 are obligatory and 9 are optional.…”

“…The researcher resorted to Melliti (2016Melliti ( , 2017 CARL model in order to extract the rhetorical patterns of 19 Biology RLsA and 19 Biology RAsA randomly downloaded from Nature journal.…”

“…• Previous Research • Previous Research melted with Background Information Regarding the PR and PR/BI case, their absence in the RAsA could be interpreted by the fact that this genre reserves a whole section in the body to review previous literature and provide background information about the topic in an extensive way compared to the RL genre (Melliti, 2017). The presence of these moves in RLsA could be attributed to the fact that it is hardly dealt with in the body sections (Melliti, 2017).…”

“…It aims at investigating and documenting the different rhetorical patterns of 19 RLsA and 19 RAsA in order to identify if there is any unique shared way to write them, determine the most publishable way of writing this genre, and detect any possibility of generic overlap between the two genres. Melliti (2016Melliti ( , 2017 CARL model has been adopted to identify the kind, frequency, and overlap of moves in RLsA and RAsA of the Journal Nature. The results indicate that although the RAs are longer than the RLs, the number of sentences in the RLsA is more than the RAsA.…”