1950
DOI: 10.1016/0030-4220(50)90289-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of general anesthesia for rheumatic heart disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Traditionally TR is a poor prognostic indicator in the MV valve repair recovery period. Studies have also shown that uncorrected TR can actually worsen in the period post MV repair [9][10][11]. In our patient, her TR was already advanced and was already complicated by CHF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Traditionally TR is a poor prognostic indicator in the MV valve repair recovery period. Studies have also shown that uncorrected TR can actually worsen in the period post MV repair [9][10][11]. In our patient, her TR was already advanced and was already complicated by CHF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Multiple management decisions had to be made perioperatively. As early as the 1950s, clinicians have noted the myriad of issues that can complicate general anesthesia for an RHD patient [4]. MR is also the most common overriding pathology, as opposed to MS as seen in our patient [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%