2005
DOI: 10.1250/ast.26.540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of fundamental frequency (F0) characteristics of speech in dysarthrias: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(14 reference statements)
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For the male participants in our study, parameter Pr01 (F0) remained unaltered. In fact, 13 out of 14 participants fell within the normal range, contradicting previous findings in the literature [32,34,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. As mentioned earlier, this discrepancy could be attributed to the sample size.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the male participants in our study, parameter Pr01 (F0) remained unaltered. In fact, 13 out of 14 participants fell within the normal range, contradicting previous findings in the literature [32,34,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57]. As mentioned earlier, this discrepancy could be attributed to the sample size.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 68%
“…Regarding acoustic parameters, on the one hand, it has been agreed that the fundamental frequency (F0) increases in the voice of people with PD [34,40,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57], consequently they present an altered periodicity of the vibration of the vocal folds and difficulty in achieving a stable phonation. Other acoustic parameters such as Jitter (measure of frequency instability) and Shimmer (measure of intensity instability) are also higher in these patients compared to healthy controls [33,34,54,56,[58][59][60][61][62][63][64][65][66].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among nonhabitual conditions, both measures of F0 tended to be maximized in the hearing impaired condition, followed by the overenunciate condition and then the clear condition. Sentence-level F0 range has further been proposed to be of perceptual importance, whereby narrower ranges have been associated with a decrease in intelligibility (Binns & Culling, 2007;Bunton, Kent, Kent, & Rosenbek, 2000;Laures & Bunton, 2003;Laures & Weismer, 1999;Miller, Schlauch, & Watson, 2010;Mori, Kobayashi, Kasuya, Kobayashi, & Hirose, 2005;Spitzer, Liss, & Mattys, 2007;Watson & Schlauch, 2008). Thus, further investigating the acoustic-perceptual relationship between F0 and intelligibility is of importance in identifying the clear speech variants that best maximize intelligibility.…”
Section: Condition Effects: Suprasegmental Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…English speaking PD patients with hypokinetic dysarthria have the same salient speech features as PD patients who speak other languages, such as Spanish and Korean [12]. Japanesespeaking PD patients also present with dysarthria and have the same speech characteristics as English-speaking patients [13]. Studies on LSVT® have been conducted in a few other languages and have primarily focused on the analysis of acoustic parameters before and a er treatment [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%