2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejpn.2013.12.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of functional goal outcomes using the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) following Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) in childhood dystonia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
71
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
71
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study population involves severely affected dyskinetic CP patients with little to no motor skills (GFMCS IV and V). 17,21 A significant difference between groups was found for the dystonia during rest subscale, but not for the dystonia during activity subscale. 9 Standardized questionnaires on quality of life or activities and participation, which were available at the time of the study, do not adequately capture the individual problems in daily life of these patients; attainment of individual goals is therefore the most useful and meaningful way to determine treatment effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Our study population involves severely affected dyskinetic CP patients with little to no motor skills (GFMCS IV and V). 17,21 A significant difference between groups was found for the dystonia during rest subscale, but not for the dystonia during activity subscale. 9 Standardized questionnaires on quality of life or activities and participation, which were available at the time of the study, do not adequately capture the individual problems in daily life of these patients; attainment of individual goals is therefore the most useful and meaningful way to determine treatment effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Most studies fail to report what matters most to children with dystonia and their carers: reduction in pain, improvements in activities of daily living, and manual function (67, 68). This is a particularly important failing since dystonia worsens in approximately 2/3 of cases and remains severe in a further 1/3 of cases referred for further management after conventional medication (1).…”
Section: Measuring What Matters Most To Children With Dystonia Is Alsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the Barry–Albright Dystonia Scale was designed to apply more easily to children, it does not seem to be as sensitive to changes after DBS, most likely because the combination of provoking and severity factors in the Burke–Fahn–Marsden Scale leads to a more fine‐grained outcome scale. Functional or goal attainment scales may have greater sensitivity to the goals of individual patients . The variability and difficulty in quantifying dystonia, the presence of other movement disorders such as spasticity or weakness, and the developmental and cognitive effects of long‐standing motor deficits make full evaluation of the effects of DBS difficult .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%