2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2012.08.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of frictional pressure drop correlations for two-phase flow in pipes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At high pressure gradient values with hydraulic diameter tube of 1.16 mm Cavallini et al [17] correlation slightly underestimates the experimental data for R134a, the prediction is quite sharp for R32 over the whole range. This is in agreement with the conclusions of Xu et al [44] who reported an extensive work with 3480 pressure drop data points collected from literature in different test modes (adiabatic, condensation and evaporation) and hydraulic diameters in the range 0.0695e14 mm. They found that the Cavallini correlation captured their evaporation data with reasonable accuracy.…”
Section: Empirical or Separate Flow Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…At high pressure gradient values with hydraulic diameter tube of 1.16 mm Cavallini et al [17] correlation slightly underestimates the experimental data for R134a, the prediction is quite sharp for R32 over the whole range. This is in agreement with the conclusions of Xu et al [44] who reported an extensive work with 3480 pressure drop data points collected from literature in different test modes (adiabatic, condensation and evaporation) and hydraulic diameters in the range 0.0695e14 mm. They found that the Cavallini correlation captured their evaporation data with reasonable accuracy.…”
Section: Empirical or Separate Flow Methodssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The accuracy criteria of ±30 % is based on the overall performance of the correlations and is consistent with the assessment done by other investigators such as [84,85,96,103 (used ±50 %)] and (Xu et al [108]). The two phase pressure drop data for air water is divided into different ranges of the pipe diameter for each pipe orientation.…”
supporting
confidence: 82%
“…As liquid is added, the viscosity of the gas-liquid mixture increases and hence it is expected that the pressure gradient rises. 20 Nevertheless, studies of adiabatic gas-liquid flow mostly focus on steady flow through uniform channels 3,40 whereas a channel with time-varying constriction degree is more pertinent for glottal flow during speech production. Although it has been shown from a dimensional analysis 10,35,37 of single-phase airflow under glottal conditions (Reynolds number Re ≤ 5 × 10 3 , Strouhal number Sr ≤ 0.1, and Mach number Ma ≤ 0.12) that incompressible, laminar, and quasisteady flow can be considered, the presence of a time-varying constriction and hence pulsating jet might affect the mixture viscosity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%