2015
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2015.1072853
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of friction velocity in unsteady flow experiments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is more difficult to control and evaluate water surface slope than the flowrate in unsteady flow, which has been broadly discussed in the literature (Dottori et al, 2009;Mrokowska et al, 2015b;Perumal et al, 2004). Moreover, water surface slope results are very sensitive to the fluctuations of water level data.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Water Surface Slopementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is more difficult to control and evaluate water surface slope than the flowrate in unsteady flow, which has been broadly discussed in the literature (Dottori et al, 2009;Mrokowska et al, 2015b;Perumal et al, 2004). Moreover, water surface slope results are very sensitive to the fluctuations of water level data.…”
Section: Evaluation Of Water Surface Slopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…S w may be evaluated as a difference quotient, provided spatial measurements of water level in several locations along the channel are available (Mrokowska et al, 2015b).…”
Section: Evaluation Of Water Surface Slopementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equation 1 contains the flow depth gradient, which is extremely difficult to determine. Mrokowska et al (2015aMrokowska et al ( , 2015b recently discussed this issue and claimed it was highly sensitive to the method used for computations. In this study, to calculate β, the variation in water depth along the flow direction (∂H/∂x) was determined from the continuous water surface profile, adjusted by a spline fitting technique to the flow depth measurements.…”
Section: Laboratory Experiments and Field Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the authors have claimed that the distance between cross sections should be large enough to perform a robust evaluation of the flow depth gradient. The impact of distance between cross sections on the gradient of flow depth has been studied in Mrokowska et al (2015) with reference to dynamic waves generated in a laboratory flume. The results have shown that with a too long distance, the gradient in the region of the wave peak is misestimated due to the linear character of approximation.…”
Section: Linear Approximation Based On Two Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Mrokowska et al (2015) it has been stated that for better representation of ϑ the central difference quotient should be applied. Due to insufficient measurement cross sections for the Olszanka watercourse, in this study only a two-point difference quotient is applied.…”
Section: Linear Approximation Based On Two Cross Sectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%