2012
DOI: 10.1097/meg.0b013e32835718d2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of four time-saving methods of reading capsule endoscopy videos

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the appropriate selection image number at the monitor improves reading efficiency and detection rate of interpreters reading CE [63]. Currently, softwares for CE reading have several view mode options, including SingleView, DualView, and QuadView, according to the number of images shown in one monitor [64]. In a survey including 530 members of the American College of Gastroenterology, SingleView, DualView, and QuadView were used by 23.7%, 40.4%, and 54.5%, respectively [65].…”
Section: Postprocedural Quality Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the appropriate selection image number at the monitor improves reading efficiency and detection rate of interpreters reading CE [63]. Currently, softwares for CE reading have several view mode options, including SingleView, DualView, and QuadView, according to the number of images shown in one monitor [64]. In a survey including 530 members of the American College of Gastroenterology, SingleView, DualView, and QuadView were used by 23.7%, 40.4%, and 54.5%, respectively [65].…”
Section: Postprocedural Quality Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quick view aims to reduce CE reading time by selecting 1 frame every X frames (as set by the reader), producing a condensed video for review. This has shown promising potential, especially when coupled with other image enhancing software systems [3,4]. Fujinon intelligent chromoendoscopy (FICE) enhances surface contrast in three specific wavelengths (red, green and blue) and appears to improve image quality and visualisation of small bowel lesions; however, its clinical utility remains unclear [5,6].…”
Section: Software and Data Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When compared with alternate time-saving strategies, this software enhancement proves to be less promising. Reading in SV or DV at 20fps was more accurate than the use of Quickview, although not as rapid 49. Further, it has been demonstrated that viewing alternate frames, by adopting the four-image sequential view and covering half the screen with a piece of paper led to a lower lesion miss rate compared with the use of Quickview 50.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%