2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of four designs of short implants placed in atrophic areas with reduced bone height: a three-year, retrospective, clinical and radiographic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extra-short dental implants have nowadays survival rates similar to conventional dental implants when the number of dental implants and the antagonist are optimal [16,17,18,19,20]. The purpose of this study was to perform a finite element analysis to compare stress distribution in two extra-short dental implants with different connections (HI and MT) with a load of 150 N axial and an oblique load of 30°.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extra-short dental implants have nowadays survival rates similar to conventional dental implants when the number of dental implants and the antagonist are optimal [16,17,18,19,20]. The purpose of this study was to perform a finite element analysis to compare stress distribution in two extra-short dental implants with different connections (HI and MT) with a load of 150 N axial and an oblique load of 30°.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For over thirty years, dental implants have been an effective solution for the restoration of the masticatory function, in the case of partially and completely edentulous patients [1,2,3,4]. The scientific literature has clearly demonstrated that dental implants are characterized by high survival and success rates, in the short [1,2] and long term [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The scientific literature has clearly demonstrated that dental implants are characterized by high survival and success rates, in the short [1,2] and long term [3,4]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The survival, success, and bone loss rate of the short implants (≤8.5 mm long) was 90% in all of the groups at the three year follow-up. It seems that the design of the implant can influence the behavior of the peri-implant bone at the crestal level [ 20 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%