2003
DOI: 10.1177/004947550303300315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Formalin — Acetone Sedimentation in the Concentration of Stool for Intestinal Parasites

Abstract: Formalin-acetone sedimentation was compared with the formalin-ether method for the concentration of stool for intestinal parasites. Of 80 stool specimens, 45 (56.25%) were positive for parasites by the formalin-acetone method. The figures for the two methods were formalin-ether 35 (43.75%) and for the direct lacto-phenol cotton blue wet mount method 17 (21.25%). There was no statistically significant difference in the parasite recovery rate between the two methods. Acetone is more stable, safer, and a cheaper … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A variety of reagents, such as ether, ethyl acetate, detergent, and acetone, have been employed in stool concentration techniques (Ritchie 1948;Young et al 1979;Kightlinger and Kightlinger 1990;Parija et al 2003;). Of these, ether is one of the more commonly useful fat solvents in the concentration of the stool for parasites (Cheesbrough 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A variety of reagents, such as ether, ethyl acetate, detergent, and acetone, have been employed in stool concentration techniques (Ritchie 1948;Young et al 1979;Kightlinger and Kightlinger 1990;Parija et al 2003;). Of these, ether is one of the more commonly useful fat solvents in the concentration of the stool for parasites (Cheesbrough 1998).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of these, ether is one of the more commonly useful fat solvents in the concentration of the stool for parasites (Cheesbrough 1998). However, ether is extremely flammable (flash point-45°C), is highly volatile (boiling point 34.5°C), produces anesthetic vapor, and forms explosive peroxides when exposed to light, as shown in Table 2 (Boswell and Collins 1996;Parija et al 2003;Lewis 1997). Because of these recognized hazards, several other chemicals have been evaluated as a substitute for diethyl ether (Young et al 1979;Kightlinger and Kightlinger 1990;Parija et al 2003;).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various studies had showen significant increase in parasitic detection after concentration metods (Parija et al, 2003;Parameshwarappa et al, 2012). Concentration allows the detection of the parasites which are present in small numbers, non-uniformly in stool samples and may be skipped by using direct wet mounts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7,8 Although several diagnostic methods such as formalin-acetone concentration (FAC), formalin-gasoline concentration (FGC), and formalin-tween concentration (FTC) techniques are available, formalin-ether concentration (FEC) technique is used as a reliable diagnostic method for helminth eggs, larvae, and protozoan cysts in stool specimens for many laboratories in different parts of the world. [9][10][11][12] However, the recovery efficiency of this technique is not as high as had been thought for some intestinal parasites. For example, the FEC method may be suboptimal for the detection of Hymenolepis nana and Iodamoeba, 9,13 T. trichiura eggs 14 and S. stercoralis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%