2020
DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2020.00738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Forensic Data Using Logistic Regression-Based Classification Methods and an R Shiny Implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, specificity and negative predicted value are the true negative rates, but the negative predicted value is based on the sum total of the number of true negatives and false negatives, whereas the specificity is based on the sum total of the number of true negative and false positives, where the true negative is the frequency of correct prediction of males when they were actually males, true positive is the frequency of correct prediction of females when they were actually females, false negative is the frequency of false prediction of females when they were actually males, and false positive is the frequency of false prediction of males when they were actually females. 17,33…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Similarly, specificity and negative predicted value are the true negative rates, but the negative predicted value is based on the sum total of the number of true negatives and false negatives, whereas the specificity is based on the sum total of the number of true negative and false positives, where the true negative is the frequency of correct prediction of males when they were actually males, true positive is the frequency of correct prediction of females when they were actually females, false negative is the frequency of false prediction of females when they were actually males, and false positive is the frequency of false prediction of males when they were actually females. 17,33…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of CPP ranges from 0% to 100%, with 100% being the best prediction, whereas the value of classification error varies from 0 to 1, with 0 indicating the best prediction, that is, the lower the error, the more reliable the model. 17 Additionally, classification error is regarded as an inappropriate comparison metric, because it is usually overestimated, that is, it does not effectively reflect the differences in values. 22 Moreover, the Matthews correlation coefficient incorporates all the four elements, namely true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative, and hence has an advantage over other accuracy measures such as positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and so on.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations