1962
DOI: 10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(62)89327-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Evaluation of Forages in the Laboratory. I. Comparative Accuracy of Several Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1969
1969
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Either 50 or 125pCi [8-14C]adenine were dissolved in 2 ml 0.02 M-sodium hydroxide and added to a growing bacterial culture under anaerobic conditions. The culture contained 27 ml clarified rumen fluid and 67 ml buffer (Baumgardt et al 1962). Optimum growth of bacteria was obtained within 24 h. The whole culture was transferred to tubes and centrifuged at 40000g for 20 min.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Either 50 or 125pCi [8-14C]adenine were dissolved in 2 ml 0.02 M-sodium hydroxide and added to a growing bacterial culture under anaerobic conditions. The culture contained 27 ml clarified rumen fluid and 67 ml buffer (Baumgardt et al 1962). Optimum growth of bacteria was obtained within 24 h. The whole culture was transferred to tubes and centrifuged at 40000g for 20 min.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Filtration was used to separate liquid and solid phases (Alexander and McGowan 1961) following the pepsin-HCl digestion. The artificial saliva solution used was a modification (Baumgardt et al 1962) of that described by McDougall (1947).…”
Section: Experiments Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples were incubated with rumen fluid for each treatment (with or without active yeast), plus McDougall buffer solution, in a glass tube, for 48 hours, in water bath at 39°C, according to the methodology described by [9] and based on the works by [10] and [11].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%