“…43 Larval populations in 2020 reached an average of 12.4 ± 4.2 per pea plant, approximating the estimated carrying capacity of pulse crop root systems where the nitrogen-fixing nodules are a limiting resource. 33,38,43 This dryland production site supported these high larval populations despite the low average rainfall in the 2020 growing season, half that of the long-term average. Dry seasons compared to wet growing seasons are not believed to favor PLW populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…18 Producers have relied on pesticides to manage PLW, with applications of insecticide to the seed prior to planting and one or two foliar sprays targeting the adults in the spring season. 42,43 Both approaches have limitations: seed treatments must be applied prophylactically before pest pressure can be surveyed and foliar sprays may not reduce adult female populations before egg laying (and subsequent larval damage) occurs. 16,[42][43][44] The benefit of insecticidal treatments to yield have not been thoroughly studied until recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,43 Both approaches have limitations: seed treatments must be applied prophylactically before pest pressure can be surveyed and foliar sprays may not reduce adult female populations before egg laying (and subsequent larval damage) occurs. 16,[42][43][44] The benefit of insecticidal treatments to yield have not been thoroughly studied until recently. 2,17 Additionally, the reliance on insecticide-based pest management may increase the risk of pea leaf weevil populations developing resistance, in addition to the negative impacts of pesticides on the environment and nontarget organisms.…”
“…43 Larval populations in 2020 reached an average of 12.4 ± 4.2 per pea plant, approximating the estimated carrying capacity of pulse crop root systems where the nitrogen-fixing nodules are a limiting resource. 33,38,43 This dryland production site supported these high larval populations despite the low average rainfall in the 2020 growing season, half that of the long-term average. Dry seasons compared to wet growing seasons are not believed to favor PLW populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…18 Producers have relied on pesticides to manage PLW, with applications of insecticide to the seed prior to planting and one or two foliar sprays targeting the adults in the spring season. 42,43 Both approaches have limitations: seed treatments must be applied prophylactically before pest pressure can be surveyed and foliar sprays may not reduce adult female populations before egg laying (and subsequent larval damage) occurs. 16,[42][43][44] The benefit of insecticidal treatments to yield have not been thoroughly studied until recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42,43 Both approaches have limitations: seed treatments must be applied prophylactically before pest pressure can be surveyed and foliar sprays may not reduce adult female populations before egg laying (and subsequent larval damage) occurs. 16,[42][43][44] The benefit of insecticidal treatments to yield have not been thoroughly studied until recently. 2,17 Additionally, the reliance on insecticide-based pest management may increase the risk of pea leaf weevil populations developing resistance, in addition to the negative impacts of pesticides on the environment and nontarget organisms.…”
“…A more recent evaluation reduced their number to nine species, of which F. oxysporum is the most important, broadly affecting many crops [ 39 ]. Within F. oxysporum , the forma specialis pisi ( Fop ) primarily infects pea [ 55 , 56 ] and grass pea [ 57 ]. Similar to the other f. sp.…”
Section: Pea Rhizospheric Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Control management involves the cultural use of extensive rotation regimes to minimise the inoculum bank, use of good agronomic practices to improve soil fertility and root growth, the avoidance of soil compaction, and the use of good quality seeds [ 56 , 110 , 112 ]. Some biocontrol agents, such as rhizosphere mycoflora and Bacillus spp., have been used as potential solutions to suppress Fsp [ 73 , 113 ].…”
Pea (Pisum sativum L.) is a grain legume widely cultivated in temperate climates. It is important in the race for food security owing to its multipurpose low-input requirement and environmental promoting traits. Pea is key in nitrogen fixation, biodiversity preservation, and nutritional functions as food and feed. Unfortunately, like most crops, pea production is constrained by several pests and diseases, of which rhizosphere disease dwellers are the most critical due to their long-term persistence in the soil and difficulty to manage. Understanding the rhizosphere environment can improve host plant root microbial association to increase yield stability and facilitate improved crop performance through breeding. Thus, the use of various germplasm and genomic resources combined with scientific collaborative efforts has contributed to improving pea resistance/cultivation against rhizospheric diseases. This improvement has been achieved through robust phenotyping, genotyping, agronomic practices, and resistance breeding. Nonetheless, resistance to rhizospheric diseases is still limited, while biological and chemical-based control strategies are unrealistic and unfavourable to the environment, respectively. Hence, there is a need to consistently scout for host plant resistance to resolve these bottlenecks. Herein, in view of these challenges, we reflect on pea breeding for resistance to diseases caused by rhizospheric pathogens, including fusarium wilt, root rots, nematode complex, and parasitic broomrape. Here, we will attempt to appraise and harmonise historical and contemporary knowledge that contributes to pea resistance breeding for soilborne disease management and discuss the way forward.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.